2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genitourinary and perineal vascular anomalies in children: A Seattle children's experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although urothelial carcinomas are the most common urinary tract malignancy in adults, they bladder, with only a few associated case reports to date. Investigators in the largest case series (45) involving childhood genitourinary and perineal vascular anomalies reviewed 3780 patient records over a 5-year period and found only 85 (2.2%) cases, none of which originated in the bladder.…”
Section: Urothelial Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although urothelial carcinomas are the most common urinary tract malignancy in adults, they bladder, with only a few associated case reports to date. Investigators in the largest case series (45) involving childhood genitourinary and perineal vascular anomalies reviewed 3780 patient records over a 5-year period and found only 85 (2.2%) cases, none of which originated in the bladder.…”
Section: Urothelial Carcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic venous malformation does not account for a high percentage of all venous malformations occurring in the body, for example, head, face and limbs, but it is the most commonly seen venous malformation occurring in visceral organs. Venous malformations can be further divided into dilated versus non-dilated types16, but essentially, these are all congenital diseases. The disease often progresses gradually over a lifetime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunostaining was evaluated according to the percentage of stained cells and the intensity of the immunoreactivity as previously reported by Willihnganz-Lawson et al . [11] The intensity of immunoreactivity was scored as follows: 0 for no staining, 1 for weak staining, 2 for moderate staining, and 3 for strong staining. The percentage of stained cells was scored as follows: 0 for <25% of stained cells, 1 for 25–49% of stained cells, 2 for 50–74% of stained cells, and 3 for ≥75% of stained cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%