2009
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Alteration Print (GAP): a tool to visualize and mine complex cancer genomic profiles obtained by SNP arrays

Abstract: GAP, a method for analyzing complex cancer genome profiles from SNP arrays, performs well even with poor quality data and rearranged genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
241
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(243 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
2
241
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GAP patterns (a two-dimensional plot of segmental copy number and allelic difference values; ref. 20) ensured the consistency and excluded noise artifacts (Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GAP patterns (a two-dimensional plot of segmental copy number and allelic difference values; ref. 20) ensured the consistency and excluded noise artifacts (Fig. 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absolute copy number and allelic contents were obtained using the Genome Alteration Print (GAP; ref. 20). DNA index was calculated as the averaged copy number.…”
Section: Snp-array Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3A; Supplementary Table S7). Moreover, ccrcc1 and ccrcc4 tumors showed a poorer PFS (13,8,19, and 24 months, respectively; P ¼ 0.0003) and OS (24,14,35, and 50 months, respectively; P ¼ 0.001) compared with ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 tumors ( Fig. 3B; Table 1; Supplementary Table S7).…”
Section: Molecular Subtypes and Sunitinib Responsementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Hybridization was performed by IntegraGen, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absolute copy numbers and genotype status of segments were determined using the genome alteration print (GAP) method (14). Segments with an absolute copy number above (respectively below) the ploidy of the sample were considered as gains (respectively losses).…”
Section: Datasets and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were primarily interpreted by regarding each tumor as a single population of cells with uniform character. Despite the inherent limitation of this assumption, as shown by the widely reported tumor-normal mixing [17][18][19], large-scale inter-tumor comparisons have led to important new insights into significantly mutated genes [12,13], recurrently perturbed pathways [20], mutation signatures [16,21], tumor subtypes [22,23], molecular predictors of outcome, and commonalities or distinctions among different cancer types [24]. However, these studies are not designed to adequately investigate intra-tumor heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%