1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01921891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome and cell sizes in frogs: A comparison with salamanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four Indian species of Microhylidae previously karyotyped, Ra. variegata (Bai 1956), M. rubra (Bai 1956), Uperodon globulosus (Chakrabarti 1979), and U. systoma (Olmo and Morescalchi 1978), belong to the subfamily Microhylinae. All of these species have 2nϭ26 chromosomes, and Ra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four Indian species of Microhylidae previously karyotyped, Ra. variegata (Bai 1956), M. rubra (Bai 1956), Uperodon globulosus (Chakrabarti 1979), and U. systoma (Olmo and Morescalchi 1978), belong to the subfamily Microhylinae. All of these species have 2nϭ26 chromosomes, and Ra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 3 species belong to Bufonidae (Asana and Mahabale 1941, Natarajan 1958b, Manna and Bhunya 1966, Chatterjee and Barik 1970, Singh et al 1970, Mittal and Sawhney 1971, Singh 1974, 9 to Dicroglossidae (Natarajan 1957b, 1958a, Singh et al 1970, Mittal and Sawhney 1971, Singh 1974, Yadav 1974, Yadav and Pillai 1975, 1976, Chakrabarti et al 1983, Joshy et al 1999, Joshy and Kuramoto 2008, 1 to Nyctibatrachidae (Joshy et al 1999), 1 to Ranixalidae (Joshy et al 1999), 3 to Ranidae (Joshy et al 1999, 2006), 3 to Rhacophoridae (Natarajan 1957a, Singh et al. 1970, Singh 1974, Rai and Dey 1991, and 4 to Microhylidae (Bai 1956, Chakrabarti 1979, Olmo and Morescalchi 1978. Most of the previous studies, however, lacked numerical data on size and shape of chromosomes, and this makes karyotype comparisons between taxa very difficult or even impossible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas significant positive relationships between genome size and erythrocyte size have been demonstrated for all other vertebrate classes (amphibians: Olmo andMorescalchi 1975, 1978;De Smet 1981;Horner and Macgregor 1983;reptiles: De Smet 1981;Olmo and Odierna 1982;fish: Pedersen 1971;Olmo 1983;mammals: Gregory 2000), no such relationship has been demonstrated (or even properly investigated) in birds. De Smet (1981) compared genome size and dry cell area in 15 species of birds and found a positive but nonsignificant correlation coefficient (r ϭ 0.34) between the two, and although other studies have found birds to fit well along the general vertebrate regression line (Commoner 1964;Olmo 1983), the existence of a relationship between genome size and cell size within the class Aves currently remains to be shown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA content shows a very high degree of interspecific variability: from 30 to over 160 pg/N in urodeles and from 2 to 25 pg/N in anurans (Morescalchi 1973;Olmo 1973;Olmo 1973;Olmo and Morescalchi 1978;Bachmann and Nishioka 1978). Among different species with the same chromosome number and belonging to the same genus the DNA content may differ by a factor of about 1.5-2.0 (Morescalchi 1973;Bachmann and Nishioka 1978).…”
Section: Dna Structure In Amphibians a The Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nuclear volume, cell volume and cell surface area show a linear and direct correlation to the nuclear DNA content (experiments on erythrocytes of amphibians) (Olmo and Morescalchi 1978). As DNA content increases, cell volume and, to a lesser extent, cell surface area both increase, and the cell surface area/cell volume ratio tends to decrease.…”
Section: Dna Structure In Amphibians a The Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 97%