2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome assembly and annotation at the chromosomal level of first Pleuronectidae: Verasper variegatus provides a basis for phylogenetic study of Pleuronectiformes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chromonomer program anchored and oriented a total of 51 scaffolds to the consensus map (Table S7) and only one contig was split into two fragments assigned to LG6 and LG9 (Figure 2). This resulted in 99.02% of the 613 Mb placed into the 21 chromosomes of the Senegalese sole karyotype, improving upon the 90.0% reported by Guerrero-Cózar et al (2021) and similar to other flatfish species recently assembled following a similar methodology (Einfeldt et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2021; Ferchaud et al, 2022) (Table S8). The new assembly showed a high one-to-one correspondence at the chromosome level with the previous version of Guerrero-Cózar et al (2021) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The Chromonomer program anchored and oriented a total of 51 scaffolds to the consensus map (Table S7) and only one contig was split into two fragments assigned to LG6 and LG9 (Figure 2). This resulted in 99.02% of the 613 Mb placed into the 21 chromosomes of the Senegalese sole karyotype, improving upon the 90.0% reported by Guerrero-Cózar et al (2021) and similar to other flatfish species recently assembled following a similar methodology (Einfeldt et al, 2021; Zhao et al, 2021; Ferchaud et al, 2022) (Table S8). The new assembly showed a high one-to-one correspondence at the chromosome level with the previous version of Guerrero-Cózar et al (2021) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This is slightly more than the 21,787 protein-coding genes discovered in Japanese flounder (Shao et al, 2017). The estimated genome size of black flounder is ~538 Mbp, similar to the genome size of other flatfish species: Japanese flounder (534 Mb) (Shao et al, 2017), Turbot (568 Mb) (Figueras et al, 2016), Spotted halibut (556 Mb) (Zhao et al, 2021), ~15% bigger than the tongue sole genome (477 Mb) (Chen et al, 2014), and ~11% smaller compared to the Senegalese sole genome (~612 Mb) (Manchado et al, 2016). It is recommended to use multiple complementary methods to assess the genome quality (Gurevich et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…According to the Ensembl Genome Browser (https://www.ensembl.org), hundreds of fish species with whole genome sequences (WGS) are available to date, and the number of species whose genomes have been sequenced continuous increasing. Among Pleuronectiformes, for example, thirteen species have their genome sequenced: tongue sole ( Cynoglossus semilaevis ) (Chen et al, 2014), Turbot ( Scophthalmus maximus ) (Maroso et al, 2018), Senegalese sole ( Solea senegalensis ) (Guerrero-Cózar, et al, 2021), Japanese flounder ( Paralichthys olivaceus ) (Shao et al, 2017), Spotted halibut ( Verasper variegatus ) (Zhao et al, 2021), Hogchoker ( Trinectes maculatus) , Pelican flounder ( Chascanopsetta lugubris) , Oriental sole ( Brachirus orientalis) , Bloch’s tonguesole ( Paraplagusia blochii) , New Zealand turbot ( Colistium nudipinnis) , Ocellated flounder ( Pseudorhombus dupliocellatus) , Starry flounder ( Platichthys stellatus) , and Indian halibut Psettodes erumei ) (Lü et al, 2021). In addition, recent studies have compiled the genomes at the chromosome level of turbot (Martínez et al, 2021) and spotted halibut (Zhao et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, RepeatMasker v4.06 (Chen, 2004) and RepeatProteinMask v4.06 (Chen, 2004) were applied for homology prediction after identification of transposable elements based on RepBase (Jurka et al, 2005). Moreover, Tandem Repeat Finder v4.09 (Benson, 1999) was separately used to predict comprehensive tandem repeats in our pipeline as previously reported (Liu et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2021). Finally, these results from the aforementioned three methods are integrated by our in-house perl scripts (https://github.com/liruihanguo/Repeats_integration).…”
Section: Repeat Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%