2019
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1905421116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome editing using the endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas system in Lactobacillus crispatus

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas systems are now widely used for genome editing and transcriptional regulation in diverse organisms. The compact and portable nature of class 2 single effector nucleases, such as Cas9 or Cas12, has facilitated directed genome modifications in plants, animals, and microbes. However, most CRISPR-Cas systems belong to the more prevalent class 1 category, which hinges on multiprotein effector complexes. In the present study, we detail how the native type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, with a 5′-AAA-3′ protospace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
99
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strikingly, the native type I-B system of C. pasteurianum facilitated more efficient genome editing of around 4-fold higher than that of the heterologously expressed Cas9 system (Pyne et al, 2016). Very recently, the type I-E system of Lactobacillus crispatus was also exploited to perform in situ genomic modifications in the host cells (Hidalgo-Cantabrana et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strikingly, the native type I-B system of C. pasteurianum facilitated more efficient genome editing of around 4-fold higher than that of the heterologously expressed Cas9 system (Pyne et al, 2016). Very recently, the type I-E system of Lactobacillus crispatus was also exploited to perform in situ genomic modifications in the host cells (Hidalgo-Cantabrana et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type I systems are the most prevalent CRISPR-Cas systems in nature 1 , which has enabled the use of endogenous CRISPR-Cas3 systems for genetic manipulation via self-targeting. This has been accomplished in Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Type I-F) 16 , Sulfolobus islandicus (Type I-A) 17 , in various Clostridium species (Type I-B) 1820 , and in Lactobacillus crispatus (Type I-E) 21 , leading to deletions as large as 97 kb amongst the self-targeted survivor cells 16 . Additionally, two recent studies have repurposed Type I systems for use in human cells, including the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) based delivery of a Type I-E system 22 , and the use of I-E and I-B systems for transcriptional modulation 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence or absence of other genes or pathways that differentiated between the four species were an L-rhamnose biosynthesis pathway in one species, a luxS gene associated with a quorum sensing system in L. reuteri and L. johnsonii (41), a type 1 CRISPR-Cas3 array in “L. peromysci” (42), pathways for thiamine biosynthesis (43) and for reduction of nitrate (44) in three species, an arginine deiminase and its repressor in L. reuteri (45), and a type VII secretion system in L. animalis (46).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%