2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3781-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-enabled predictions for fruit weight and quality from repeated records in European peach progenies

Abstract: BackgroundHighly polygenic traits such as fruit weight, sugar content and acidity strongly influence the agroeconomic value of peach varieties. Genomic Selection (GS) can accelerate peach yield and quality gain if predictions show higher levels of accuracy compared to phenotypic selection. The available IPSC 9K SNP array V1 allows standardized and highly reliable genotyping, preparing the ground for GS in peach.ResultsA repeatability model (multiple records per individual plant) for genome-enabled predictions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers use different thresholds for determining which markers to include in their genomics studies, such as 5% MAF (11,17), 1% MAF within-populations (43), and ten copies of the minor allele across samples (18). In the present study, markers were initially excluded with MAF <2.5%, though these statistics were calculated for each marker before imputation, and, as such, the study included markers with MAF below this threshold (MAF altered after imputation of missing calls).…”
Section: Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers use different thresholds for determining which markers to include in their genomics studies, such as 5% MAF (11,17), 1% MAF within-populations (43), and ten copies of the minor allele across samples (18). In the present study, markers were initially excluded with MAF <2.5%, though these statistics were calculated for each marker before imputation, and, as such, the study included markers with MAF below this threshold (MAF altered after imputation of missing calls).…”
Section: Association Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling traits simultaneously allows to achieve larger genomic prediction accuracy for the target trait, compared to single-trait genomic prediction (Dekkers 2007;Jia and Jannink 2012;Alimi 2016;Biscarini et al 2017;Sun et al 2017). The benefit from multi-trait genomic prediction using the target and intermediate traits simultaneously, relative to single trait prediction using the target trait exclusively depends on the trait correlations and trait heritability Jia and Jannink 2012), in the same way as discussed in Chapter 4 for the correlated selection response when measuring the same trait in two different regions (Atlin et al 2000;Piepho and Möhring 2005)…”
Section: Genomic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we will use 'intermediate traits' to refer to all the traits that are genetically correlated to yield. As genetically-correlated traits are informative with respect to each other, modelling yield and its intermediate traits simultaneously allows to achieve larger yield genomic prediction accuracy, compared to single-trait genomic prediction (Dekkers, 2007;Jia & Jannink, 2012;Alimi, 2016;Biscarini et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2017). Another condition for multi-trait genomic prediction to show a larger accuracy than single trait prediction is that the heritability of the intermediate trait is large (Jia & Jannink, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative trait loci (QTL) are measurable regions of the genome affecting highly polygenic traits such as fruit weight, sugar content, and acidity [49,50]. QTL associated with fruit weight has aroused great interest in different breeding programs [44].…”
Section: Cubiu Fruit Weight During Ripeningmentioning
confidence: 99%