2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-1993-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome engineering and plant breeding: impact on trait discovery and development

Abstract: Key messageNew tools for the precise modification of crops genes are now available for the engineering of new ideotypes. A future challenge in this emerging field of genome engineering is to develop efficient methods for allele mining.AbstractGenome engineering tools are now available in plants, including major crops, to modify in a predictable manner a given gene. These new techniques have a tremendous potential for a spectacular acceleration of the plant breeding process. Here, we discuss how genetic diversi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, CRISPR‐Cas9 generates a large targeted genetic diversity that helps in understanding gene function in polyploid species, but also provide an exceptional genetic resource for breeding (Nogué et al ., 2016). In particular, it provides a very efficient method for selecting an ideotype (oil profile), minimizing negative effects (growth trade‐off), by selecting the nature of the alleles and their most efficient genetic combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, CRISPR‐Cas9 generates a large targeted genetic diversity that helps in understanding gene function in polyploid species, but also provide an exceptional genetic resource for breeding (Nogué et al ., 2016). In particular, it provides a very efficient method for selecting an ideotype (oil profile), minimizing negative effects (growth trade‐off), by selecting the nature of the alleles and their most efficient genetic combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether they will prove a viable alternative to transgenic and traditional breeding approaches (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms, 2012; Araki and Ishii, 2015). In fact, these approaches will enable the use of sequence information from more distantly related, cross-incompatible CWR (and indeed non-CWR) for crop improvement (Nogué et al, 2016;Spindel and McCouch 2016). However, alterations of larger pieces of sequence information and of different genes simultaneously (e.g., haplotype blocks), as well as of structural variants (e.g., chromosomal fragments), are becoming increasingly feasible (Lowder et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2015).…”
Section: Technological Advances In Using Cwrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globalization has allowed pests and pathogens to circulate freely, so farmers cultivating historical landraces often have to apply many phytosanitary treatments or risk losing their entire crop, making it impossible to meet the goals of keeping inputs to a minimum and using minimally aggressive agricultural practices. Problems related to traditional methods, such as linkage drag in backcrossing (introducing undesirable genes linked to the gene introduced mainly when the donor is a wild plant), can be overcome by biotechnological approaches available today (Nogué et al, 2016) and others that will surely be devised in the future.…”
Section: Landraces the New Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%