2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Modeling System: A Knowledge Management Platform for Genomics

Abstract: In this work, we present the Genome Modeling System (GMS), an analysis information management system capable of executing automated genome analysis pipelines at a massive scale. The GMS framework provides detailed tracking of samples and data coupled with reliable and repeatable analysis pipelines. The GMS also serves as a platform for bioinformatics development, allowing a large team to collaborate on data analysis, or an individual researcher to leverage the work of others effectively within its data managem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All sequence data were processed using the Genome Modeling System (GMS) (12, 13) reference alignment, somatic variation, and clinical sequencing pipelines. Briefly, raw sequence data were aligned to the human reference genome (build 37) with bwa v0.5.9 (14) using default parameters except for ‘-t 4 -q 5’.…”
Section: Patient Population and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All sequence data were processed using the Genome Modeling System (GMS) (12, 13) reference alignment, somatic variation, and clinical sequencing pipelines. Briefly, raw sequence data were aligned to the human reference genome (build 37) with bwa v0.5.9 (14) using default parameters except for ‘-t 4 -q 5’.…”
Section: Patient Population and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small insertions and deletions (indels) were detected by taking the union of four variant callers: GATK somatic indel (15), Pindel v0.5, Varscan v2.2.6, and Strelka v0.4.6.2 all using default parameters except for ‘isSkipDepthFilters = 1’ for Strelka. All variants were manually reviewed using the Integrated Genome Browser (IGV) (19) as previously described (13). All SNVs and indels passing manual review were annotated to determine their predicted effect on amino acid sequences using the GMS transcript annotator and known transcript models from Ensembl (version 74) (20).…”
Section: Patient Population and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the second relapse sample occurred after an allograft from a sibling donor, we needed to flow enrich tumor cells from the “blast gate” to reduce contamination from the allograft donor, which would have confounded the sequencing results (Supplementary Methods). Whole genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed using library construction and capture hybridization methods previously described [17, 18]. Alignment of whole genome and exome data was performed using the Genome Modeling System (GMS) essentially as described in Griffith et al [18].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed using library construction and capture hybridization methods previously described [17, 18]. Alignment of whole genome and exome data was performed using the Genome Modeling System (GMS) essentially as described in Griffith et al [18]. Germline and somatic variant detection was performed using multiple tools for each type of variant, including single nucleotide variants, small insertions and deletions, large amplifications and deletions, and structural variants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Briefly, paired-end reads were aligned to human reference sequence GRCh37, using BWA 29 (discovery) or BWA-MEM 30 (extension), and de-duplicated using Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Variants were identified using SAMtools, 29 SomaticSniper, 31 VarScan, 32 MuTect, 33 Strelka, 34 Pindel, 35 and GATK, 36 and annotated using the GMS variant annotator (Ensembl v74).…”
Section: Sequence Alignment and Variant Callingmentioning
confidence: 99%