2013
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201300037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution

Abstract: A common belief is that evolution generally proceeds towards greater complexity at both the organismal and the genomic level, numerous examples of reductive evolution of parasites and symbionts notwithstanding. However, recent evolutionary reconstructions challenge this notion. Two notable examples are the reconstruction of the complex archaeal ancestor and the intron-rich ancestor of eukaryotes. In both cases, evolution in most of the lineages was apparently dominated by extensive loss of genes and introns, r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
286
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
35
286
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it seems likely that, most of the time, the majority of the genomes are somewhat smaller than the long-term equilibrium size. A biologically plausible scenario is that prokaryotes are exposed to beneficial genetic material only for short periods of time, resulting in brief intervals of fast growth followed by slow genome shrinking (30). Steady state is possible under this scenario as well but only as the average over multiple cycles of gain and loss, which probably occur on a timescale much longer than the scale of the ATGC evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it seems likely that, most of the time, the majority of the genomes are somewhat smaller than the long-term equilibrium size. A biologically plausible scenario is that prokaryotes are exposed to beneficial genetic material only for short periods of time, resulting in brief intervals of fast growth followed by slow genome shrinking (30). Steady state is possible under this scenario as well but only as the average over multiple cycles of gain and loss, which probably occur on a timescale much longer than the scale of the ATGC evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genome streamlining hypothesis argues that species with large effective population sizes are under selective pressures that favor small genomes, reducing the material or energetic cost of cellular replication in nutrient-poor environments (47,48). Streamlined genomes are found in diverse, uncultivated bacteria in the oligotrophic ocean (49,50), and it has been suggested that evolution of the Archaea, in particular, has been dominated by reductive selection (51). As exemplified by Prochlorococcus (52), the uncultivated bacterial clade SAR86 (50), and Pelagibacter (39), reductive selection can result in a loss of metabolic versatility or nutritional dependencies (53), such as the loss of pathways for assimilation of oxidized forms of nitrogen or essential vitamin cofactors.…”
Section: Comparative Genomic Analyses Suggest Adaptations To the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although evolution is usually associated with genome complexification (Wolf and Koonin, 2013), in the BQH the source of evolutionary opportunities is simplification through gene loss. Typically, gene loss results from two different forces: genetic drift and positive selection.…”
Section: Size Matters In the Bqhmentioning
confidence: 99%