2005
DOI: 10.1038/nature04338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog

Abstract: Here we report a high-quality draft genome sequence of the domestic dog (Canis familiaris), together with a dense map of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across breeds. The dog is of particular interest because it provides important evolutionary information and because existing breeds show great phenotypic diversity for morphological, physiological and behavioural traits. We use sequence comparison with the primate and rodent lineages to shed light on the structure and evolution of genomes and genes. Not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

83
2,079
5
23

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,236 publications
(2,245 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
83
2,079
5
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationships we recovered within Vulpini are identical to those found by Lindblad-Toh et al . [45] after accounting for differences in species sampling. An unexpected result, however, is that Vulpes velox and Vulpes macrotis are not sister species, given the long-standing question as to whether or not they are indeed separate species (for example, compare the two taxonomies [13] and [14] from Wozencraft).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships we recovered within Vulpini are identical to those found by Lindblad-Toh et al . [45] after accounting for differences in species sampling. An unexpected result, however, is that Vulpes velox and Vulpes macrotis are not sister species, given the long-standing question as to whether or not they are indeed separate species (for example, compare the two taxonomies [13] and [14] from Wozencraft).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This possibility is also supported by recent progress of genomic studies on domesticated mammals and birds (for example, dog, cat, cow, chicken, and pigeon) (Lindblad‐Toh et al, 2005; Wayne and Ostrander, 2007; Akey et al, 2010; Vonholdt et al, 2010; Shapiro et al, 2013). These studies explain the processes underlying fixation of genetic mutations through selective pressure on favorable morphological and/or physiological features, providing a more specific and promising framework for combined genomic and developmental biological approaches to investigate how fixed mutations altered ontogenetic processes to form the favorable morphological features in domestic animals in the context of evolutionary developmental biology (Cresko et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The latter is greatly aided by the fact that dogs and humans share roughly the same gene repertoire (Lindblad-Toh et al, 2005;Derrien et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concomitantly, a large number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs; >2 million) were discovered and the architecture of the dog genome was largely deciphered (Lindblad-Toh et al, 2005). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was shown to extend over much longer distances within breeds (as a result of the founder effects accompanying breed formation), hence drastically reducing the number of markers needed for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) compared to humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%