2008
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1403
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
911
3
18

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,092 publications
(976 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
16
911
3
18
Order By: Relevance
“…We have selected (a) 14 popular white rot fungal strains – Ceriporiopsis subvermispora B (Fernandez-Fueyo et al 2012), Heterobasidion annosum v2.0 (Olson et al 2012), Fomitiporia mediterranea v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Phanerochaete carnosa HHB-10118 (Suzuki et al 2012), Pycnoporus cinnabarinus BRFM 137 (Levasseur et al 2014), Phanerochaete chrysosporium R78 v2.2 (Martinez et al 2004; Ohm et al 2014), Dichomitus squalens LYAD-421 SS1 (Floudas et al 2012), Trametes versicolor v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Punctularia strigosozonata v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Phlebia brevispora HHB-7030 SS6 (Binder et al 2013), Botrytis cinerea v1.0 (Amselem et al 2011), Pleurotus ostreatus PC15 v2.0 (Riley et al 2014; Alfaro et al 2016; Castanera et al 2016), Stereum hirsutum FP-91666 SS1 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Pleurotus eryngii ATCC90797 (Guillen et al 1992; Camarero et al 1999; Ruiz‐Dueñas et al 1999; Matheny et al 2006); (b) 15 popular brown rot fungal strains – Postia placenta MAD 698-R v1.0 (Martinez et al 2009), Fibroporia radiculosa TFFH 294 (Tang et al 2012), Wolfiporia cocos MD-104 SS10 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Dacryopinax primogenitus DJM 731 SSP1 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Daedalea quercina v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Laetiporus sulphureus var v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Postia placenta MAD-698-R-SB12 v1.0 (Martinez et al 2009), Neolentinus lepideus v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Serpula lacrymans S7.9 v2.0 (Eastwood et al 2011), Calocera cornea v1.0 (Eastwood et al 2011), Gloeophyllum trabeum v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Fistulina hepatica v1.0 (Floudas et al 2015), Fomitopsis pinicola FP-58527 SS1 (Floudas et al 2015), Hydnomerulius pinastri v2.0 (Kohler et al 2015) and Coniophora puteana v1.0 (Kohler et al 2015); (c) 13 popular soft rot fungal strains – Trichoderma reesei v 2.0 (Martinez et al 2008), Rhizopus oryzae 99-880 from Broad (Ma et al 2009), Aspergillus wentii v1.0 (De Vries et al 2017), Penicillium chrysogenum Wisconsin 54-1255 (Van Den Berg et al 2008), Daldinia eschscholzii EC12 v1.0, Hypoxylon sp. CI-4A v1.0 (Wu et al 2017), Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 v4.0 (Andersen et al 2011), Hypoxylon sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have selected (a) 14 popular white rot fungal strains – Ceriporiopsis subvermispora B (Fernandez-Fueyo et al 2012), Heterobasidion annosum v2.0 (Olson et al 2012), Fomitiporia mediterranea v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Phanerochaete carnosa HHB-10118 (Suzuki et al 2012), Pycnoporus cinnabarinus BRFM 137 (Levasseur et al 2014), Phanerochaete chrysosporium R78 v2.2 (Martinez et al 2004; Ohm et al 2014), Dichomitus squalens LYAD-421 SS1 (Floudas et al 2012), Trametes versicolor v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Punctularia strigosozonata v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Phlebia brevispora HHB-7030 SS6 (Binder et al 2013), Botrytis cinerea v1.0 (Amselem et al 2011), Pleurotus ostreatus PC15 v2.0 (Riley et al 2014; Alfaro et al 2016; Castanera et al 2016), Stereum hirsutum FP-91666 SS1 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Pleurotus eryngii ATCC90797 (Guillen et al 1992; Camarero et al 1999; Ruiz‐Dueñas et al 1999; Matheny et al 2006); (b) 15 popular brown rot fungal strains – Postia placenta MAD 698-R v1.0 (Martinez et al 2009), Fibroporia radiculosa TFFH 294 (Tang et al 2012), Wolfiporia cocos MD-104 SS10 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Dacryopinax primogenitus DJM 731 SSP1 v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Daedalea quercina v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Laetiporus sulphureus var v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Postia placenta MAD-698-R-SB12 v1.0 (Martinez et al 2009), Neolentinus lepideus v1.0 (Nagy et al 2015), Serpula lacrymans S7.9 v2.0 (Eastwood et al 2011), Calocera cornea v1.0 (Eastwood et al 2011), Gloeophyllum trabeum v1.0 (Floudas et al 2012), Fistulina hepatica v1.0 (Floudas et al 2015), Fomitopsis pinicola FP-58527 SS1 (Floudas et al 2015), Hydnomerulius pinastri v2.0 (Kohler et al 2015) and Coniophora puteana v1.0 (Kohler et al 2015); (c) 13 popular soft rot fungal strains – Trichoderma reesei v 2.0 (Martinez et al 2008), Rhizopus oryzae 99-880 from Broad (Ma et al 2009), Aspergillus wentii v1.0 (De Vries et al 2017), Penicillium chrysogenum Wisconsin 54-1255 (Van Den Berg et al 2008), Daldinia eschscholzii EC12 v1.0, Hypoxylon sp. CI-4A v1.0 (Wu et al 2017), Aspergillus niger ATCC 1015 v4.0 (Andersen et al 2011), Hypoxylon sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trichoderma reesei is the major fungus used for industrial cellulase production. The secreted cellulases comprise two cellobiohydrolases and eight endoglucanases from six glycoside hydrolase families [3] which act in a synergistic manner to degrade the plant biomass, together with beta-glucosidases and hemicellulases. In total, the T. reesei genome contains 200 glycoside hydrolases and more than 20 of them can be found in the secretome [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secreted cellulases comprise two cellobiohydrolases and eight endoglucanases from six glycoside hydrolase families [3] which act in a synergistic manner to degrade the plant biomass, together with beta-glucosidases and hemicellulases. In total, the T. reesei genome contains 200 glycoside hydrolases and more than 20 of them can be found in the secretome [3,4]. It is supposed that the presence of multiple enzymes displaying the same type of activity (as is the case for endoglucanases) is necessary for efficient biomass hydrolysis, but the precise role of the individual enzymes is still not well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Trichoderma karyotype was shown to be comprised of six large chromosomes (Gilly & Sands 1991) similar to karyotypes of Neurospora (Orbach et al 1988) and other filamentous ascomycetes (Mills & McCluskey 1990). The genome sequence for the reference strain of T. reesei (Martinez et al 2008) indicated that biomass degraded enzymes were clustered in the genome and served as the basis for early resequencing studies on high cellulase-producing strains (Le Crom et al 2009; Koike et al 2013). …”
Section: Pathogenic Aspergillimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, to facilitate the understanding of Trichoderma , a public taxonomy database at http://www.isth.info/spans the transition from morphological taxonomy to molecular taxonomy and includes barcode sequences and protocols, although it has not been updated recently. Genome data supporting the Trichoderma research community include publicly available assembled genome sequences for several species (Martinez et al 2008; Druzhinina et al 2011; Kubicek et al 2011). While not as prolific as for other fungi, public sequence resources at the NCBI Short Read Archive include 76 genome sequence and one transcriptome sequence.…”
Section: Pathogenic Aspergillimentioning
confidence: 99%