2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02804286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size discriminates between closely related taxaElytrigia repens andE. intermedia (Poaceae: Triticeae) and their hybrid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genera where detailed studies on genome size variation were already performed include Hydrangea (Cerbah et al. 2001), Artemisia (Torrell and Vallès 2001), Elytrigia (Mahelka et al . 2005) and Curcuma (Leong-Škorničková et al 2007), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genera where detailed studies on genome size variation were already performed include Hydrangea (Cerbah et al. 2001), Artemisia (Torrell and Vallès 2001), Elytrigia (Mahelka et al . 2005) and Curcuma (Leong-Škorničková et al 2007), among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of hybridization among those species of Elytrigia has been suggested on the basis on morphological and anatomical intermediacy of some individuals found in the same habitat as their putative progenitors. Recent flow cytometric and karyological investigations have confirmed common natural hybridization in the Elytrigia repens E. intermedia alliance (Mahelka et al 2005). The genome size turned out to be a reliable marker for these taxa and hybrid delimitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The knowledge that genome size is usually constant within the same taxonomic entity ( Greilhuber, 2005 ) but may vary tremendously even among closely related taxa ( Bennett and Leitch, 2005 ) provides a foundation for employing genome size as an important taxonomic marker. Indeed, this character has proven successful in resolving complex low-level taxonomies, delimiting species boundaries, and revealing cryptic taxa ( Dimitrova et al, 1999 ;Mahelka et al, 2005 ;Kron et al, 2007 ;Suda et al, 2007 ). Despite its potential taxonomic value, genome size has largely been neglected in the biosystematics of ferns in general (but see Bure š et al, 2003 ;Ebihara et al, 2005 ;Ekrt and Š tech, 2008 ;Ekrt et al, 2009 ), and in the D. carthusiana group in particular.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%