2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2011.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size, GC percentage and 5mC level in the Indonesian coelacanth Latimeria menadoensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A). These results indicate that the sequences of the exons of HOX cluster genes are probably unique in the coelacanth genome because the genome size estimated from the coverage of those exons was consistent with the size estimated from the weight of nuclear DNA content (~3 Gbp) (Makapedua et al, 2011).…”
Section: Repetitive Elements and Coveragesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…3A). These results indicate that the sequences of the exons of HOX cluster genes are probably unique in the coelacanth genome because the genome size estimated from the coverage of those exons was consistent with the size estimated from the weight of nuclear DNA content (~3 Gbp) (Makapedua et al, 2011).…”
Section: Repetitive Elements and Coveragesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The teleost (bony fish), which have 5mC and CGIs (Han and Zhao 2008), do not have a bimodal distribution of 8-mers suggesting that CG methylation in these genomes is not mutagenic and the T•G mismatches are repaired to C•G base pair. The bimodal distribution of 8-mers is initially observed in the coelacanth (Amemiya et al 2013) which also contains 5mC (Makapedua et al 2011) and has fewer CGs than expected (Iwasaki et al 2014) suggesting that at this time the efficient repair of T•G mismatch to a C•G base pair was lost (fig. 1 and supplementary fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite the high number of expected transposable elements responsible for the enormous size of the lungfish genomes (Metcalfe et al. 2012; Metcalfe and Casane 2013), which is about 38 fold of the coelacanth genome (Makapedua et al. 2011), transposable elements showed lower expression values in P. annectens than in coelacanths (Biscotti et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%