2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome sizes through the ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most exciting areas of stomatal research to recently emerge suggests that the genome size of angiosperms is a strong, positive predictor of guard cell length (GCL) (Beaulieu et al, 2008). This study, which covered a phylogenetically diverse sample of angiosperms, across varying growth forms (monocots, eudicots, trees, shrubs and herbs), supports the early work of Masterson (1994) whose data suggested that the small guard cell size of Cretaceous angiosperms was indicative of a small genome (Leitch, 2007). These published findings open the intriguing possibility of using the fossil angiosperm GCL record to track evolutionary changes in the size of a plant's genome over geological time, analogous to the studies of Thomson (1972), Conway Morris & Harper (1988) and Organ et al (2007) in animals.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One of the most exciting areas of stomatal research to recently emerge suggests that the genome size of angiosperms is a strong, positive predictor of guard cell length (GCL) (Beaulieu et al, 2008). This study, which covered a phylogenetically diverse sample of angiosperms, across varying growth forms (monocots, eudicots, trees, shrubs and herbs), supports the early work of Masterson (1994) whose data suggested that the small guard cell size of Cretaceous angiosperms was indicative of a small genome (Leitch, 2007). These published findings open the intriguing possibility of using the fossil angiosperm GCL record to track evolutionary changes in the size of a plant's genome over geological time, analogous to the studies of Thomson (1972), Conway Morris & Harper (1988) and Organ et al (2007) in animals.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(2007) used osteocyte cell size in fossil dinosaurs to infer that the small genome size of birds was a pre‐existing trait within the saurischian dinosaur lineage. Leaf impression fossils with well‐defined guard cells are common in the fossil record for plants, and therefore, based on the results presented here, we suggest ancestral genome sizes could be inferred for early land plants (Leitch, 2007). Extending this work further could examine how genome size responds to climatic catastrophes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seeking to understand how such diversity in genome size evolved over the c. 110-120 million years since monocots first appeared in the fossil record [161], ideally one would aim to obtain genome size estimates from key fossil taxa. However, although various approaches have been suggested for using fossil epidermal or guard cells as proxies for genome size [162,163], the poor and patchy fossil record for monocots has precluded such an approach so far. An alternative line of attack is to use statistical modelling to reconstruct genome size evolution.…”
Section: Evolution Of Genome Size Diversity Within Monocotsmentioning
confidence: 99%