2021
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02235-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome Streamlining, Plasticity, and Metabolic Versatility Distinguish Co-occurring Toxic and Nontoxic Cyanobacterial Strains of Microcoleus

Abstract: Microcoleus autumnalis , and closely related Microcoleus species, compose a geographically widespread group of freshwater benthic cyanobacteria. Canine deaths due to anatoxin-a poisoning, following exposure to toxic proliferations, have been reported globally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(156 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the wide host-ranges reported for some phages that can infect multiple bacterial species of the same genus, or even members of different genera (Ross et al, 2016). Given that the Microcoleus genomes predicted as hosts also match MAGs recovered from congeneric species from New Zealand rivers (Tee et al, 2021(Tee et al, , 2020) (Table S3), it is feasible that the cyanophages we have identified in two riverine systems of North America are also capable of infecting mat-forming Microcoleus from New Zealand streams.…”
Section: Lytic Microcoleus Phages In Toxigenic Mat Samples From Two D...supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the wide host-ranges reported for some phages that can infect multiple bacterial species of the same genus, or even members of different genera (Ross et al, 2016). Given that the Microcoleus genomes predicted as hosts also match MAGs recovered from congeneric species from New Zealand rivers (Tee et al, 2021(Tee et al, , 2020) (Table S3), it is feasible that the cyanophages we have identified in two riverine systems of North America are also capable of infecting mat-forming Microcoleus from New Zealand streams.…”
Section: Lytic Microcoleus Phages In Toxigenic Mat Samples From Two D...supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In the case of the CRISPR-Cas system, we used the CrisprOpenDB database (comprises 11,767,782 spacer sequences from bacterial genomes) as a comparative reference (Dion et al, 2021). Also, we used the Mining CRISPRs in Environmental Datasets tool (MinCED v0.4.2) (Bland et al, 2007) to retrieve 15,495 spacer sequences from 178 MAGs obtained from Microcoleus-dominated mats and non-axenic isolates from different rivers in USA, New Zealand and Canada (Table S1) (Bouma-Gregson et al, 2022Conklin et al, 2020;Tee et al, 2021;Valadez-Cano et al, 2023). All spacer sequences were compared against the putative phage sequences recovered from the Wolastoq and Eel River mats using the BLASTn-short function (E-value ≤ 1.0 x 10 -10 , sequence identity ≥ 95%, covering at least 90% of the query spacer sequence) of the BLAST+ package.…”
Section: Phage-host Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the CRISPR‐Cas system, we used the CrisprOpenDB database (comprises 11,767,782 spacer sequences from bacterial genomes) as a comparative reference (Dion et al, 2021). Also, we used the Mining CRISPRs in Environmental Datasets tool ( MinCED v0.4.2 ) (Bland et al, 2007) to retrieve 15,495 spacer sequences from 178 MAGs obtained from Microcoleus ‐dominated mats and non‐axenic isolates from different rivers in USA, New Zealand and Canada (Table S1) (Bouma‐Gregson et al, 2019, 2022; Conklin et al, 2020; Tee et al, 2021; Valadez‐Cano et al, 2023). All spacer sequences were compared against the putative phage sequences recovered from the Wolastoq and Eel River mats using the BLASTn‐short function ( E ‐value ≤1.0 × 10 −10 , sequence identity ≥95%, covering at least 90% of the query spacer sequence) of the BLAST+ package.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although microenvironmental physiochemistry at mat–coral interfaces has received some research attention (Titlyanov et al, 2007), contact‐mediated destabilizing effects on the coral or cyanobacterial mat microbiome have not been explored previously. Stoichiometric changes at this interface may mediate the shifts among dominant cyanobacterial populations within mats (Tee et al, 2021) toward sulfide‐tolerant clones and overall cause comparatively benign cyanobacterial mats to become virulent. Microenvironment changes or direct microbial transfer (mat‐to‐coral inoculation) at the interaction interfaces may also alter the resident coral microbiome, inducing dysbiosis similar to macroalgal contact‐mediated effects (Nugues et al, 2004).…”
Section: Five Priority Research Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%