2016
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide association analyses reveal complex genetic architecture underlying natural variation for flowering time in canola

Abstract: Optimum flowering time is the key to maximize canola production in order to meet global demand of vegetable oil, biodiesel and canola-meal. We reveal extensive variation in flowering time across diverse genotypes of canola under f ield, glasshouse and controlled environmental conditions. We conduct a genome-wide association study and identify 69 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers associated with flowering time, which are repeatedly detected across experiments. Several associated SNPs occur in cluster… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether the accessions that carry the repeat expansion are genetically similar to each other, we analyzed the genetic diversity among Irish accessions using DArT-seq (Raman et al, 2015). From the DArT-Seq data, we compiled data for 4556 SNPs for which genotypic information was available for over 90% of the accessions and utilized this data to analyze the genetic architecture of the samples that we collected in Ireland (Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether the accessions that carry the repeat expansion are genetically similar to each other, we analyzed the genetic diversity among Irish accessions using DArT-seq (Raman et al, 2015). From the DArT-Seq data, we compiled data for 4556 SNPs for which genotypic information was available for over 90% of the accessions and utilized this data to analyze the genetic architecture of the samples that we collected in Ireland (Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar situation existed in the present study: when a GWAS was performed using the BLUP values in an MLM based on a modified Bonferroni threshold of p < 5.0 × 10 −5 [−log 10 ( p ) = 4.3, 1/19,945], only one significant SNP on the A5 chromosome was discovered (Figure S1). Thus, to detect as many association signals as possible for use in further research, the significance threshold of association analysis in the MLM was dropped to a less stringent value (i.e., p < 1.0 × 10 −3 , −log 10 ( p ) = 3.0, Figure 5, Figure S1), which has been widely used in association mapping in rapeseed (Cai et al, 2014; Hatzig et al, 2015; Raman et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An MLM can be described by the following matrix notation: y = X β + Zu + e , in which y is the phenotype; X is the genotype; β is a vector containing the fixed effects, including the genetic marker and the population structure (Q); Z is the relative kinship matrix; u is a vector of random additive genetic effects; and e is the unobserved vector of the random residual. The threshold of significant association between a trait and the SNPs in the MLM was p < 1.0 × 10 −3 [i.e., −log 10 ( p ) = 3.0], which has been broadly adopted in the literature (Cai et al, 2014; Hatzig et al, 2015; Raman et al, 2015). The GWAS results were visualized with Manhattan and quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots that were yielded from the qqman package in R software (Turner, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, GWAS approaches using whole genome sequencing have allowed researchers to dissect genetic regulation of complex traits such as oil biosynthesis, carotenoid concentration and yield in well studied crops including maize and rice (Gao et al, 2013; Li H. et al, 2013; Suwarno et al, 2015). In oilseed rape, GWAS using DartSeq and Brassica 60K SNP array genotyping approaches allowed identification of alleles involved in regulation of flowering time, as well as seed quality traits including germination, vigor and seed weight (Li et al, 2014; Hatzig et al, 2015; Raman et al, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%