2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5518-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome wide association and gene enrichment analysis reveal membrane anchoring and structural proteins associated with meat quality in beef

Abstract: Background Meat quality related phenotypes are difficult and expensive to measure and predict but are ideal candidates for genomic selection if genetic markers that account for a worthwhile proportion of the phenotypic variation can be identified. The objectives of this study were: 1) to perform genome wide association analyses for Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF), marbling, cooking loss, tenderness, juiciness, connective tissue and flavor; 2) to determine enriched pathways present in each genom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results provide biological support to some of the previously identified pQTLs related to complex phenotypes in cattle and could contribute to discovery of potential causative polymorphisms. pQTL and eQTL colocalization for NTF3 (cooking loss) and GPR98 (tenderness) was evident in the present population [16]; however, more research is required in order to be able to determine if these genes harbor actual causative markers associated with meat quality. The use of causative polymorphisms in genomic prediction is the ideal scenario since it is not affected by recombination events between the actual pQTL and the marker being genotyped, over time.…”
Section: Applicability Of the Present Results And Future Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results provide biological support to some of the previously identified pQTLs related to complex phenotypes in cattle and could contribute to discovery of potential causative polymorphisms. pQTL and eQTL colocalization for NTF3 (cooking loss) and GPR98 (tenderness) was evident in the present population [16]; however, more research is required in order to be able to determine if these genes harbor actual causative markers associated with meat quality. The use of causative polymorphisms in genomic prediction is the ideal scenario since it is not affected by recombination events between the actual pQTL and the marker being genotyped, over time.…”
Section: Applicability Of the Present Results And Future Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…NTF3 was identified in a previous study as highly associated with cooking loss [16] pointing out that markers inside this locus are able to explain variation at both the phenotype and gene expression level. This implicates NTF3 as a positional and functional gene with a potential role in meat quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…pQTL and eQTL colocalization for NTF3 (cooking loss) and GPR98 (tenderness) was evident in the present population [16]; however, more research is required in order to be able to determine if these…”
Section: Applicability Of the Present Results And Future Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Table 3. Genes uncovered by the expression and DE analysis, and previously identified as associated with meat quality related phenotypes using a genotype-phenotype association analysis in the present population [80,81]. (adjusted p-value ≤ 0.1) and 198 (adjusted p-value ≤ 0.1) genes were DE for WBSF, tenderness and marbling, respectively.…”
Section: List Of Abbreviationsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The key genes identified in the protein-protein interaction network (Figure 4), NFKB2, ABLIM1, EIF4E2, ARPC5L and ARF6 , are involved in multiple cellular functions such as actin polymerization, cytoskeletal structure and transcription factor activity [22]. Table 3 shows a list of genes that were simultaneously identified by Leal-Gutiérrez et al (2018c) [80] and Leal-Gutiérrez et al (2019) [81] using genotype-phenotype association in the present population and genes that were identified in the expression or DE analysis. A total of 14 genes were identified using genotype-phenotype and expression-phenotype association approaches simultaneously.…”
Section: Overlapping Genes Across De Evaluation and Genome Wide Assocmentioning
confidence: 99%