2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-013-9924-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association mapping for five major pest resistances in wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of an elite panel limited the array of allelic variation assessed in this study and, as expected, failed to detect a few QTLs that have been previously shown to be associated with WSS resistance (Sherman et al, 2010;Joukhadar et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the use of this panel allowed us to determine the genetic basis of WSS resistance available within North American breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of an elite panel limited the array of allelic variation assessed in this study and, as expected, failed to detect a few QTLs that have been previously shown to be associated with WSS resistance (Sherman et al, 2010;Joukhadar et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the use of this panel allowed us to determine the genetic basis of WSS resistance available within North American breeding programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The QTLs on chromosomes 1B, 2D, 4A and 5B were identified in a recombinant inbred line population derived from a cross between the spring wheat lines Conan (PI607549) (WestBred, LLC) and Reeder (PI613586) (Sherman et al, 2010), which are the parent cultivars described in Weaver et al (2009). The remaining QTLs were identified in an associationmapping panel comprised of wheat landraces, synthetic hexaploid wheat, and elite lines from West Asia (Joukhadar et al, 2013). Lines that head late in the season escape infestation because their stems are not suitable for egg-laying during the WSS oviposition period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The position of the 3BS QTL identified with both linkage mapping (on the left) and association mapping (on the right) approaches. Several studies have employed GWAM to characterize many agronomic traits, disease and insect pest resistance in wheat consistent with the approach adopted in this study (Maccaferri et al 2011(Maccaferri et al , 2015Miedaner et al 2011;Neumann et al 2011;Yu et al 2011Yu et al , 2012Wang et al 2012;Kollers et al 2013;Mulki et al 2013;Joukhadar et al 2013;Sela et al 2014;Zegeye et al 2014). Standard bi-parental crosses have been initiated using some of the potentially diverse germplasm based on varying disease reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type I errors are attributed to confounding effects of population structure (Breseghello and Sorrells 2006), but studying the structure for traits that vary due to the environmental gradients which overlap with patterns of population structure, like flowering time, can also lead to type II errors (Brachi et al 2011). The MLM approach has been employed in many recent genetic studies to identify genes that conferred resistance to many biotic stresses as well as uncovering the genetic basis of agronomically useful traits (Maccaferri et al 2011(Maccaferri et al , 2015Miedaner et al 2011;Neumann et al 2011;Yu et al 2011Yu et al , 2012Wang et al 2012;Kollers et al 2013;Mulki et al 2013;Joukhadar et al 2013;Sela et al 2014;Rasheed et al 2014;Zegeye et al 2014;Emebiri and Ogbonnaya 2015). In GWAM, the use of mixed linear models (MLM) (Yu et al 2006;Kang et al 2008;Stich and Melchinger 2009) that utilizes Q and K performs better than general linear model (GLM) in correcting for false-positive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marker-trait associations using association mapping have been identified in different crops (Zhu et al, 2008) using different types of molecular markers. Similarly, association mapping studies have been performed in wheat for grain yield (Crossa et al, 2007;Edae et al, 2014;Lopes et al, 2014;Ogbonnaya et al, 2017), resistance to foliar diseases (Crossa et al, 2007;Tadesse et al, 2014;Sukumaran et al, 2015Sukumaran et al, , 2016Jighly et al, 2015), soil-borne pathogens (Mulki et al, 2013), and resistance to major insect pests ( Joukhadar et al, 2013). Similarly, association mapping studies have been performed in wheat for grain yield (Crossa et al, 2007;Edae et al, 2014;Lopes et al, 2014;Ogbonnaya et al, 2017), resistance to foliar diseases (Crossa et al, 2007;Tadesse et al, 2014;Sukumaran et al, 2015Sukumaran et al, , 2016Jighly et al, 2015), soil-borne pathogens (Mulki et al, 2013), and resistance to major insect pests ( Joukhadar et al, 2013).…”
Section: Heat-tolerant Qtls Associated With Grain Yield and Its Compomentioning
confidence: 99%