2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.953833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study, haplotype analysis, and genomic prediction reveal the genetic basis of yield-related traits in soybean (Glycine max L.)

Abstract: Identifying the genetic components underlying yield-related traits in soybean is crucial for improving its production and productivity. Here, 211 soybean genotypes were evaluated across six environments for four yield-related traits, including seed yield per plant (SYP), number of pods per plant number of seeds per plant and 100-seed weight (HSW). Genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction (GP) analyses were performed using 12,617 single nucleotide polymorphism markers from NJAU 355K SoySNP Ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the SNP, viz., Chr18_32068331, was detected through all the five GWAS models, while in contrast, four significant SNPs among the total eleven were identified through only one GWAS model. Similar results were previously reported in different studies, such as in soybean (Bhat et al 2022b ), maize (Kaler et al 2020) and wheat (Merrick et al 2022 ). This can be explained by the fact that different GWAS models are based on different hypotheses involving varied QTL effect distribution characteristics (Bhat et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the SNP, viz., Chr18_32068331, was detected through all the five GWAS models, while in contrast, four significant SNPs among the total eleven were identified through only one GWAS model. Similar results were previously reported in different studies, such as in soybean (Bhat et al 2022b ), maize (Kaler et al 2020) and wheat (Merrick et al 2022 ). This can be explained by the fact that different GWAS models are based on different hypotheses involving varied QTL effect distribution characteristics (Bhat et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, branch number is a complex quantitative trait which is highly influenced by the environment; thus, conventional efforts have not met breeding demands (Shim et al 2019 ). In this regard, molecular breeding has emerged as a potential approach for breeding improved soybean cultivars with higher precision and accuracy (Bhat et al 2022b ). However, in molecular breeding, it is important first to know the genetic basis of the traits of interest, such as branch number, and use the detected QTLs/genes/haplotypes associated with such traits in soybean breeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2001) proposed the concept of genomic prediction for genomic selection, it was successfully implemented in an animal breeding program for complex quantitative traits (Schaeffer et al., 2006) and subsequently utilized in a plant breeding program (Massman et al., 2013). To date, genomic selection has been successfully applied in soybean breeding programs for key traits, including seed oil and protein (Hemingway et al., 2021; Jarquin et al., 2016; Stewart‐Brown et al., 2019), grain yield (Bhat et al., 2022; Ravelombola et al., 2021; Stewart‐Brown et al., 2019), agronomic traits (Ma et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016), and disease resistance (Bao et al., 2014; de Azevedo Peixoto et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2022). Further nutritional component applications of genomic prediction in soybean will be discussed in later sections.…”
Section: Protein and Amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%