2013
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-Wide Association Study of Genetic Predictors of Overall Survival for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Never Smokers

Abstract: To identify the genetic factors that influence overall survival in never smokers who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we performed a consistency meta-analysis study utilizing genome-wide association approaches for overall survival in 327 never smoker NSCLC patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center and 293 cases from the Mayo Clinic. We then performed a two-pronged validation of the top 25 variants that included additional validation in 1,256 NSCLC patients from Taiwan and assessment of expression qua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To deal with the aforementioned challenge, all of these types of tests share the common feature that they group or collapse rare variation, usually by gene, in order to increase statistical power (see Wu et al, 2013 for a recent review). Early tests (such as the cohort allelic sums test [Morgenthaler and Thilly, 2007] and the combined multivariate collapsing method [Li and Leal, 2008]) assumed that each variant had the same direction of effect and, in addition, required a fixed minor allele frequency cutoff to define which variants to include; but these assumptions are not always valid or optimal.…”
Section: Genomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with the aforementioned challenge, all of these types of tests share the common feature that they group or collapse rare variation, usually by gene, in order to increase statistical power (see Wu et al, 2013 for a recent review). Early tests (such as the cohort allelic sums test [Morgenthaler and Thilly, 2007] and the combined multivariate collapsing method [Li and Leal, 2008]) assumed that each variant had the same direction of effect and, in addition, required a fixed minor allele frequency cutoff to define which variants to include; but these assumptions are not always valid or optimal.…”
Section: Genomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent trend in cancer research is to shift the focus of the search for prognostic markers from the tumoral DNA to the germline DNA, based on the realization that genetic polymorphisms can modulate the risk of developing certain types of cancer and even influence the prognosis . In lung cancer, several studies have tested candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in association with disease prognosis, but only a few studies used a genome‐wide design . However, these studies included patients with all forms of nonsmall cell lung cancer, without taking into account the different histological subtypes despite the fact that histological type is a determinant of survival .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 In lung cancer, several studies have tested candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in association with disease prognosis, but only a few studies used a genome-wide design. 13,14 However, these studies included patients with all forms of nonsmall cell lung cancer, without taking into account the different histological subtypes despite the fact that histological type is a determinant of survival. 15,16 Therefore, it could be useful to analyze a single histotype of lung cancer for genetic determinants of survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, genome-wide studies were conducted to investigate the association of SNPs with OS in patients with advanced NSCLC; however, no significant association was reported for SNPs in MDM2. [51][52][53][54][55] These results suggested that SNPs in MDM2 might have only limited effects on the survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. The inconsistencies among different studies might have resulted from the heterogeneity among the studies (eg, different tumor cell grade of differentiation, smoking cessation, dietary supplements, or genetic variations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%