2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-019-2361-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide association study reveals the genetic control underlying node of the first fruiting branch and its height in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MLM_ Q + K model analysis, the population structure ( Q ) and the kinship matrix ( K ) values were applied as covariates. Finally, 3,301 high-quality SNPs were selected for GWAS and the threshold of P-value for the significance of “suggestive association” that allows one time false positive effect in GWAS test was calculated based on “1/n” method with n being the number of SNPs as noted by many previous studies ( Cai et al 2017 , Duggal et al 2008 , Fu et al 2019 , Li et al 2013 , Shi et al 2018 , Sun et al 2017 , Yang et al 2014 ). Thus, the SNPs with -log10P ≥3.51 ( P = 1/3,301) were regarded as suggestive trait-associated SNPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For MLM_ Q + K model analysis, the population structure ( Q ) and the kinship matrix ( K ) values were applied as covariates. Finally, 3,301 high-quality SNPs were selected for GWAS and the threshold of P-value for the significance of “suggestive association” that allows one time false positive effect in GWAS test was calculated based on “1/n” method with n being the number of SNPs as noted by many previous studies ( Cai et al 2017 , Duggal et al 2008 , Fu et al 2019 , Li et al 2013 , Shi et al 2018 , Sun et al 2017 , Yang et al 2014 ). Thus, the SNPs with -log10P ≥3.51 ( P = 1/3,301) were regarded as suggestive trait-associated SNPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genome-wide association study (GWAS) is an effective approach to investigate complex phenotypic traits and to identify loci associated with target traits [32]. GWAS has been widely used to study agronomically important traits of a variety of crops, including maize, soybean, rice, cotton and wheat [33][34][35][36][37]. In addition, GWAS has been used to identify the genes underlying resistance to stripe rust in wheat [20,[38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the completion of cotton genome sequencing (Paterson et al 2012;Zhang et al 2015;Hu et al 2019;Huang et al 2020) and the establishment of a high-throughput genotyping platform based on the high-throughput array (Hulse-Kemp et al 2015;Cai et al 2017), a large number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers have been developed, which greatly promoted the application genome-wide association analyses in cotton. Recently, GWAS research have mainly focused on ber quality (Gapare et al 2017;Sun et al 2017;Dong et al 2018;Li et al 2018a;Tan et al 2018;Yuan et al 2019b) and cotton yield components (Su et al 2016;Sun et al 2018;Song et al 2019;Xing et al 2019;Zhu et al 2020), disease tolerance (Li et al 2017), reniform nematode resistance (Li et al 2018c), salt tolerance (Yuan et al 2019a), drought stress (Hou et al 2018;Li et al 2020) and other agronomic traits in cotton (Li et al 2018b;Yuan et al 2018;Fu et al 2019). However, there are few reports for revealing loci and candidate genes of the lint percentage (LP, %) by GWAS and WGCNA analysis combining strategy in cotton.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%