2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-647012/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide interaction analysis identified low-frequency variants with sex disparity in lung cancer risk

Abstract: There is growing evidence showing that sex disparity in lung cancer risk cannot be fully explained by sex differences in smoking behavior, implying existence of genetic and molecular basis for sex disparity in lung cancer development. However, the information about sex dimorphism in lung cancer risk is quite limited despite the great success in lung cancer association studies. By adopting a stringent two-stage analysis strategy, we performed a genome-wide gene-sex interaction analysis using genotype from a lun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main risk factor for developing NSCLC is smoking, which is preventable, yet highly prevalent with over a billion smokers around the world [2]. Moreover, smoking, and other environmental pollutants interact with biological factors such as aging and genetic risk variants to increase disease burden [3][4][5][6]. Furthermore, the NSCLC risk has been shown to correlate positively with severity and duration of smoking, and negatively with time since smoking cessation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main risk factor for developing NSCLC is smoking, which is preventable, yet highly prevalent with over a billion smokers around the world [2]. Moreover, smoking, and other environmental pollutants interact with biological factors such as aging and genetic risk variants to increase disease burden [3][4][5][6]. Furthermore, the NSCLC risk has been shown to correlate positively with severity and duration of smoking, and negatively with time since smoking cessation [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%