2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide investigation of the dynamic changes of epigenome modifications after global DNA methylation editing

Abstract: Chromatin properties are regulated by complex networks of epigenome modifications. Currently, it is unclear how these modifications interact and if they control downstream effects such as gene expression. We employed promiscuous chromatin binding of a zinc finger fused catalytic domain of DNMT3A to introduce DNA methylation in HEK293 cells at many CpG islands (CGIs) and systematically investigated the dynamics of the introduced DNA methylation and the consequent changes of the epigenome network. We observed ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inefficacy of 5mC to act as a dominant repressive mechanism is further supported by in vivo experiments in Xenopus embryos, which demonstrated that methylated CpG-rich promoter-reporter gene constructs are robustly expressed at late-blastula and gastrula stages [ 65 ]. Two different studies, which employed precise epigenome editing to target the catalytic domain of DNMT3A to CpG-rich genomic locations via a zinc finger effector, came to different conclusions related to the repressive potential of 5mC at CGIs [ 66 , 67 ]. While one study observed efficient 5mC-mediated gene repression [ 66 ], the other revealed varying effects including the compatibility of 5mC, H3K4me3 and RNA polymerase II at numerous genomic loci [ 67 ].…”
Section: MC and Transcriptional Repression At Cgismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inefficacy of 5mC to act as a dominant repressive mechanism is further supported by in vivo experiments in Xenopus embryos, which demonstrated that methylated CpG-rich promoter-reporter gene constructs are robustly expressed at late-blastula and gastrula stages [ 65 ]. Two different studies, which employed precise epigenome editing to target the catalytic domain of DNMT3A to CpG-rich genomic locations via a zinc finger effector, came to different conclusions related to the repressive potential of 5mC at CGIs [ 66 , 67 ]. While one study observed efficient 5mC-mediated gene repression [ 66 ], the other revealed varying effects including the compatibility of 5mC, H3K4me3 and RNA polymerase II at numerous genomic loci [ 67 ].…”
Section: MC and Transcriptional Repression At Cgismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different studies, which employed precise epigenome editing to target the catalytic domain of DNMT3A to CpG-rich genomic locations via a zinc finger effector, came to different conclusions related to the repressive potential of 5mC at CGIs [ 66 , 67 ]. While one study observed efficient 5mC-mediated gene repression [ 66 ], the other revealed varying effects including the compatibility of 5mC, H3K4me3 and RNA polymerase II at numerous genomic loci [ 67 ]. Notably, these two studies were not carried out in the same cell line.…”
Section: MC and Transcriptional Repression At Cgismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChIP was performed as previously described [24]. In brief, 2.5 × 10 6 cells were harvested and washed with PBS supplemented with 500 nM Trichostatin A.…”
Section: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (Chip-qpcr and Chip-seq)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA methylation analysis investigations, for example, were conducted on human samples, whereas the miRNA research was primarily dominated by in vitro experiments. Based on current trends in toxicoepigenomics research, numerous gaps have been identified that must be filled to fully understand the molecular mechanisms behind toxicant-related epigenetic alterations [10,11]. The consistency of epigenetic modifications happening in the experimental platform and the type of designed study such as in vitro, in vivo, and human investigations, as well as the relevance of such epigenetic alterations in changing the risk of disease in the exposed populations.…”
Section: Current Trends In Toxicoepigenomics Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%