2017
DOI: 10.1101/146829
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome-wide quantification of the effects of DNA methylation on human gene regulation

Abstract: . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these patterns suggest that epigenetic modifications play a role in the phenotypic differentiation observed between continental and insular populations. Follow‐up assays to quantify genome‐wide genetic variation and methylation‐dependent expression are necessary to implicate DNA methylation in functional biological differences and control for genetic variation (Dubin et al, ; Tadut, Colomé‐Tatché, & Johannes, ; Lea et al, ), and confirm consistent epigenetic patterning over gene promoters and enhancers. While we found minimal differences between our putatively regulatory and unannotated region methylation data sets, we predict that comparative analyses of methylation between promoter and unannotated regions could be used to assess relative variation explained by phenotypically‐relevant environmental predictors and a step towards deconvoluting the evolutionary significance of certain loci (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these patterns suggest that epigenetic modifications play a role in the phenotypic differentiation observed between continental and insular populations. Follow‐up assays to quantify genome‐wide genetic variation and methylation‐dependent expression are necessary to implicate DNA methylation in functional biological differences and control for genetic variation (Dubin et al, ; Tadut, Colomé‐Tatché, & Johannes, ; Lea et al, ), and confirm consistent epigenetic patterning over gene promoters and enhancers. While we found minimal differences between our putatively regulatory and unannotated region methylation data sets, we predict that comparative analyses of methylation between promoter and unannotated regions could be used to assess relative variation explained by phenotypically‐relevant environmental predictors and a step towards deconvoluting the evolutionary significance of certain loci (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional caveat to consider is that some cell lines have lost cGAS/STING signaling and thus it would not be possible to assess this mtp53 gain-of-function in those cells. ( 4043 )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetic modifications, such as DNA methylation, contribute to complex traits and diseases 27; 28 . Methylation of cytosine residues within CpG dinucleotides is an important mechanism of variation and regulation in the genome 2932 . Cytosine methylation, particularly in the promoter region of genes, is often associated with a decrease in transcription 33 , and DNA methylation in the first intron and gene expression is correlated and conserved across tissues and vertebrate species 34 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%