2007
DOI: 10.1038/msb4100147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome‐wide transcriptional plasticity underlies cellular adaptation to novel challenge

Abstract: By recruiting the essential HIS3 gene to the GAL regulatory system and switching to a repressing glucose medium, we confronted yeast cells with a novel challenge they had not encountered before along their history in evolution.Adaptation to this challenge involved a global transcriptional response of a sizeable fraction of the genome, which relaxed on the time scale of the population adaptation, of order of 10 generations.For a large fraction of the responding genes there is no simple biological interpretation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
127
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process that leads to cell arrest in our experiments is presumably different from the one observed during starvation since it is imposed only on some of the cells and because it facilitates the generation of an adapted state in others. This observation might be supported by our previous work showing that along phase I there has been a genomewide arbitrary transcriptional response involving a large fraction of the genome and having a very small overlap with known stress responses (Stern et al, 2007). Such a dramatic transcriptional response might significantly affect the physiology in ways that on the one hand will lead to cell arrest but on the other will open up new opportunities for adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The process that leads to cell arrest in our experiments is presumably different from the one observed during starvation since it is imposed only on some of the cells and because it facilitates the generation of an adapted state in others. This observation might be supported by our previous work showing that along phase I there has been a genomewide arbitrary transcriptional response involving a large fraction of the genome and having a very small overlap with known stress responses (Stern et al, 2007). Such a dramatic transcriptional response might significantly affect the physiology in ways that on the one hand will lead to cell arrest but on the other will open up new opportunities for adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In previous studies, the growth dynamics of the population upon exposure to Glu-his was studied in a chemostat (Novick and Szilard, 1950) in which large populations of rewired cells were grown in Gal-his and switched to Glu-his medium under controlled and otherwise stable environmental conditions. Our chemostat setup allowed us to monitor online the cell density [optical density (OD)] and automatically sample the population at a high temporal resolution for further analyses of the cells [see examples in Stolovicki et al (2006) and Stern et al (2007)]. In this study, repeated chemostat experiments were carried out under identical conditions and the reproducible patterns of the population growth dynamics pointed out to a few robust features (Fig.…”
Section: The Population Growth Dynamics During Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scenario cannot be rejected by existing experimental results (30) and is appealing as it allows for an indirect, long-term benefit of temporary reaction activation even if, as predicted here, this activation inhibits growth in the short term. Although whole-cell regulation remains largely unexplained, there are known mechanisms that could subsequently lead to optimal growth (43,44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The most dramatic case of transcriptional reprogramming following a stress involves a genetically engineered form of starvation for histidine in yeast [30], which transcriptionally reprograms more than 1,000 genes (although the gene sets are different in different cells) [31]; the involvement of RTNs in this system has not yet been established, however.…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%