Gene-knockout experiments on single-cell organisms have established that expression of a substantial fraction of genes is not needed for optimal growth. This problem acquired a new dimension with the recent discovery that environmental and genetic perturbations of the bacterium Escherichia coli are followed by the temporary activation of a large number of latent metabolic pathways, which suggests the hypothesis that temporarily activated reactions impact growth and hence facilitate adaptation in the presence of perturbations. Here, we test this hypothesis computationally and find, surprisingly, that the availability of latent pathways consistently offers no growth advantage and tends, in fact, to inhibit growth after genetic perturbations. This is shown to be true even for latent pathways with a known function in alternate conditions, thus extending the significance of this adverse effect beyond apparently nonessential genes. These findings raise the possibility that latent pathway activation is in fact derivative of another, potentially suboptimal, adaptive response.complex networks | flux balance analysis | metabolic networks | gene dispensability | synthetic rescues L iving cells are surprisingly robust against mutations and, in particular, against gene knockouts (1-5). The origin of mutational robustness-whether it is a directly evolved trait or a byproduct of evolutionary history-remains debatable (6). In either case, metabolic network analysis shows that the nonessentiality of enzymes and associated genes is largely due to the inactivity of the corresponding metabolic reactions under laboratory conditions (7-9). This leaves environmental robustness as the natural candidate to explain gene nonessentiality. Yet, apart from chemical stress-based assays (10), studies designed to test whether nonessential genes become essential under different conditions have failed to identify a phenotype for more than a small fraction of additional genes (11). A recent groundbreaking study has shown, however, that a large fraction of reactions not active under standard laboratory conditions become transiently active after a genetic or environmental perturbation (12, 13). Why? The prevailing interpretation has been that the transient activation of such latent pathways facilitates adaptation to new conditions, thereby attributing function to genes that have been classified as dispensable for the lack of phenotype in steady-state experiments. This is naturally formulated as the hypothesis that latent pathways have a positive impact on postperturbation growth (cellular reproduction), which is a measure of competitive advantage with a strong empirical basis (1-3, 10, 11, 13). Even for genes with known functions under different conditions, this hypothesis is appealing as it suggests the possibility of an alternate phenotype that would not be detected in traditional high-throughput screens of knockout mutants (14).Here, we test this hypothesis using the most complete in silico reconstruction of the metabolic network of Escherichia c...