2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2013.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic analyses of RH alleles to improve transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease

Abstract: Background: Red cell (RBC) blood group alloimmunization remains a major problem in transfusion medicine. Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at particularly high risk for developing alloantibodies to RBC antigens compared to other multiply transfused patient populations. Hemagglutination is the classical method used to test for blood group antigens, but depending on the typing methods and reagents used may result in discrepancies that preclude interpretation based on serologic reactivity alone. Molecul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15 RHD and RHCE alleles were assigned on the basis of either a single or a combination of genetic markers and haplotype associations based on reported alleles. 5,16,17 Among all 134 randomly assigned SWiTCH study participants, 27 children had documented Rh immunization at study entry. Controls were identified from nonimmunized SWiTCH participants and matched first for duration of transfusions (mean difference, 0.0 y; median difference, 0.0 y) and then for age at first stroke (mean difference, 0.6 y; median difference, 0.0 y).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 RHD and RHCE alleles were assigned on the basis of either a single or a combination of genetic markers and haplotype associations based on reported alleles. 5,16,17 Among all 134 randomly assigned SWiTCH study participants, 27 children had documented Rh immunization at study entry. Controls were identified from nonimmunized SWiTCH participants and matched first for duration of transfusions (mean difference, 0.0 y; median difference, 0.0 y) and then for age at first stroke (mean difference, 0.6 y; median difference, 0.0 y).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RHD exon 8 had low sequence coverage (median coverage, ,63; Figure 3A), and therefore WES did not reliably detect the c.1138C.T change (p.Thr379Met) in exon 8 that has an allele frequency of 0.1019 to 0.1710 in African individuals (Table 2). 5,16 WES also did not detect the RHD 37-bp duplication that inactivates D antigen expression (D-phenotype) referred to as the RHD pseudogene (supplemental Table 2). However, the RHD pseudogene has the stop codon c.807T.G (p.Try269Stop) in exon 6 that was identified by WES.…”
Section: Rh Genotype By Wesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RHD*weak D 4.2.2 was the most common RHD variant allele (50%), followed by RHD*weak partial D 4.0 (20%), RHD*DVII (10%), and RHD*DAU0.01 (10%); and the most prevalent RHCE -altered alleles were RHCE*ce48C (40%), RHCE*ceAR (20%), and RHCE*ce 48C,733G (8%). These alleles were also found in other cohorts of Afro-American and Afro-Caribbean SCD patients [28,29]. Identifying RH variants at the beginning of the transfusion protocol could have prevented RH alloimmunization by providing antigen-negative or haplotype-compatible RBC units, but RH genotyping is not currently available for all Brazilian centers that treat SCD patients.…”
Section: Antigen-matching In Sickle Cell Disease Patients: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), including the recently reported RHCE*ce(c.48C, c.105T) allele [25], which is reminiscent to the RHCE*ce.01 allele with an additional silent c.105C>T variant, and a yet unreported RHCE*ce(c.712A, c.733G, c.787G, c.800A, c.916G) allele, which only differs from the RHCE*ce.04 allele by the c.48G>C transversion that is not found here. QMPSF analysis of the 47 samples genotyped as weak D type 4.2.2 exhibited aberrant results in five DNAs (data not shown), which is a typical feature of degraded genomic DNA [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%