2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-022-03093-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Analysis and Molecular Characteristics in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, CRE has been reported in different countries and regions. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that the majority of CRE strains produce carbapenemases, the most prevalent carbapenemase genes were KPC and NDM [ 2 5 ]. Since the discovery of bla NDM−1 in Escherichia coli isolated from India in 2008, NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been widely reported throughout the world, and Asia is thought to be the primary epidemic location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, CRE has been reported in different countries and regions. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that the majority of CRE strains produce carbapenemases, the most prevalent carbapenemase genes were KPC and NDM [ 2 5 ]. Since the discovery of bla NDM−1 in Escherichia coli isolated from India in 2008, NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae have been widely reported throughout the world, and Asia is thought to be the primary epidemic location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These substitutions have been demonstrated to increase the K M parameters for sulfas with less dramatic effects on the K M for pABA, thus conferring a substrate discrimination ability to these DHPS variants, a property absent in the wild-type (WT) enzymes 22 . The second type of sulfa resistance is associated with genes (sul) typically encoded on plasmids found in clinical isolates of such Gram-negative species as E. coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and K. pneumoniae [24][25][26] . While this type of plasmid-borne sulfa resistance was first reported in the 1950s and 1960s for Shigella and E. coli 27,28 , it was not characterized until 1975.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%