2019
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.13990/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic analysis of Escherichia coli strains isolated from diseased chicken in the Czech Republic

Abstract: Background: Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) can cause various extraintestinal infections in poultry, resulting in massive economic losses in poultry industry. In addition, some avian E. coli strains may have zoonotic potential, making poultry a possible source of infection for humans. Due to its extreme genetic diversity, this pathotype remains poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate the diversity of colibacillosis-associated E. coli isolates from Central European countries with a focus on the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These improved molecular typing approaches have facilitated greater characterization of APEC and identification of individual genotypes of concern (Maluta et al, 2014), identification of specific gene subsets (Knöbl et al, 2012), and discrimination of avian pathogenic strains from avian faecal E. coli (AFEC) and other niches (Logue et al, 2017). Relatively few studies utilize WGS approaches to examine the phylogeny of APEC; however, this approach is starting to become more widely used and allows unification classification by serotyping, MLST, and phylogrouping to accurately define predominant APEC populations (Papouskova et al, 2020). This more complex approach is required to understand APEC virulence, transmission and population dynamics.…”
Section: Advances In Apec Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These improved molecular typing approaches have facilitated greater characterization of APEC and identification of individual genotypes of concern (Maluta et al, 2014), identification of specific gene subsets (Knöbl et al, 2012), and discrimination of avian pathogenic strains from avian faecal E. coli (AFEC) and other niches (Logue et al, 2017). Relatively few studies utilize WGS approaches to examine the phylogeny of APEC; however, this approach is starting to become more widely used and allows unification classification by serotyping, MLST, and phylogrouping to accurately define predominant APEC populations (Papouskova et al, 2020). This more complex approach is required to understand APEC virulence, transmission and population dynamics.…”
Section: Advances In Apec Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%