2012
DOI: 10.2174/1874285801206010005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Comparison of the Closely Related Salmonella enterica Serovars Enteritidis and Dublin

Abstract: The Enteritidis and Dublin serovars of Salmonella enterica are closely related, yet they differ significantly in pathogenicity and epidemiology. S. Enteritidis is a broad host range serovar that commonly causes gastroenteritis and infrequently causes invasive disease in humans. S. Dublin mainly colonizes cattle but upon infecting humans often results in invasive disease.To gain a broader view of the extent of these differences we conducted microarray-based comparative genomics between several field isolates fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously analyzed the SDu1 to SDu3 and SDu5 isolates by comparative genomic hybridization using a Salmonella pan-array, but no signal for tviA was detected in the genomes of these isolates (49). This indicates that a different mechanism mediates fliC repression in S. Dublin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We previously analyzed the SDu1 to SDu3 and SDu5 isolates by comparative genomic hybridization using a Salmonella pan-array, but no signal for tviA was detected in the genomes of these isolates (49). This indicates that a different mechanism mediates fliC repression in S. Dublin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we have shown by comparative genomics that S. Dublin has a larger number of pseudogenes than its close relative but ubiquitous serovar S. Enteritidis (49). Moreover, Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum, a serovar closely related to S. Dublin and S. Enteritidis that is avian restricted and causes an invasive typhoid-like disease in chickens, is nonflagellated due to pseudogene accumulation in flagellar genes (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specialist Y. ruckeri has the smallest genome of any Yersinia species, although this does not appear to be a result of reductive evolution, as its genome contains relatively few pseudogenes. Both Y. pestis and Y. ruckeri lack genes for urease, vitamin B12 metabolism, and the methionine salvage pathway, perhaps because these pathogens do not colonize the mammalian intestine (Chen et al 2010) Betancor et al 2012). The pigeonassociated S. Typhimurium DT2 strain 94-213 has 84 pseudogenes, including 21 loci that are intact in other closely related S. Typhimurium strains, and shows distinctive patterns of gene expression (Kingsley et al 2013).…”
Section: Genomic Signatures Of Host Specificity Genomic Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the shdA and misL genes encode nonfimbrial adhesins that enhance intestinal colonization of S. Typhimurium (Kingsley et al 2000Dorsey et al 2005). Pseudogene formation in host-restricted Salmonella serovars has inactivated both shdA (S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A, S. Paratyphi C, S. Dublin, and S. Gallinarum) and misL (S. Typhi) McClelland et al 2004;Thomson et al 2008;Liu et al 2009;Betancor et al 2012). Another group of intestinal colonization factors of S. Typhimurium is encoded by fimbrial operons of the chaperone usher assembly class .…”
Section: Genomic Signatures Of Host Specificity Genomic Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that S. Dublin is highly invasive in cattle and humans when compared to other NTS [38]. In humans, S. Dublin often results in bacteraemia with severe disease and high mortality [39]. In S. Typhimurium ST313, the hypothetical virulence determinant (ST313-TD) is included within a 17.7 kb region that may represent a novel pathogenicity island (ST313-GI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%