2016
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic dissection of plant development and its impact on thousand grain weight in barley through nested association mapping

Abstract: HighlightThe genetic control of plant development was investigated in a multi-parental wild barley NAM population. We found that major flowering genes control plant development and highlight trait-improving exotic alleles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
118
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(106 reference statements)
24
118
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, unweighted neighbor joining (NJ) dendrogram was constructed by DARwin V.5.0.158 software (Perrier & Jacquemoud-Collet, 2006), based ) based on two-year data of five quantitative traits were 0.73 for plant height, 0.88 for time of ear emergence, and 0.95 for ear length, ear density and 1000-seed weight. These results are, in general, congruent or even above heritability estimates reported for the same traits in other studies in barley (Pasam et al, 2012;Maurer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Inference Of Population Structure and Familybased Relatednesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, unweighted neighbor joining (NJ) dendrogram was constructed by DARwin V.5.0.158 software (Perrier & Jacquemoud-Collet, 2006), based ) based on two-year data of five quantitative traits were 0.73 for plant height, 0.88 for time of ear emergence, and 0.95 for ear length, ear density and 1000-seed weight. These results are, in general, congruent or even above heritability estimates reported for the same traits in other studies in barley (Pasam et al, 2012;Maurer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Inference Of Population Structure and Familybased Relatednesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Maurer, Draba, and Pillen () found several markers ( SNP11_10044 , SNP11_10754 , SNP11_20650 , SNP11_10867 , SNP11_31420 ) associated to sdw1 . These markers were mapped in a 0.5‐cM interval by Mascher et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of all GWAS runs were used to calculate the detection rate of each marker, which is defined as the percentage of runs in which the analyzed marker displays a significant association (P ≤ 0.001) with the trait of interest (W€ urschum & Kraft, 2014). Markers showing a detection rate ≥ 20% or 50% and P ≤ 0.001 were defined as reliable or very reliable and assumed to be putative QTLs (Maurer et al, 2016). Allelic effects and phenotypic variance explained by markers (R²) were also estimated in TASSEL 4.1 (Bradbury et al, 2007).…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Studymentioning
confidence: 99%