2011
DOI: 10.2174/138920211795564386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Diversity in Pig (Sus scrofa) and its Comparison with Human and other Livestock

Abstract: We have reviewed the current pig (Sus scrofa) genomic diversity within and between sites and compared them with human and other livestock. The current Porcine 60K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel has an average SNP distance in a range of 30 - 40 kb. Most of genetic variation was distributed within populations, and only a small proportion of them existed between populations. The average heterozygosity was lower in pig than in human and other livestock. Genetic inbreeding coefficient (FIS), population … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
25
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
10
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both parameters displayed values that are in the lower range of what has been reported so far. In this sense, Zhang and Plastow [11] described values of 0.54 (range: 0.35–0.65) and 0.57 (range: 0.35–0.71) for observed and expected heterozygosities in European pig populations genotyped with the Illumina Porcine SNP60 BeadChip. The low heterozygosity values we have observed in Iberian pigs and European and Near Eastern wild boar cannot be explained in terms of limited sampling ( Table S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both parameters displayed values that are in the lower range of what has been reported so far. In this sense, Zhang and Plastow [11] described values of 0.54 (range: 0.35–0.65) and 0.57 (range: 0.35–0.71) for observed and expected heterozygosities in European pig populations genotyped with the Illumina Porcine SNP60 BeadChip. The low heterozygosity values we have observed in Iberian pigs and European and Near Eastern wild boar cannot be explained in terms of limited sampling ( Table S1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 1, the CNV number detected per individual varies greatly, ranging from 2 (MS8) to 13 (D2). Chinese indigenous breeds have larger genetic diversity than European breeds [30], and it is expected more CNVs would existed in them. Contrary to expectations, in our study, fewer CNVs per pig were detected in Chinese indigenous and wild pigs (average 5.5) than in the modern commercial breeds (average 10.5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese indigenous breeds have larger genetic diversity and higher average heterozygosity than European breeds [30], which can help to detect fruitful breed-specific CNVs which have segregated among different populations in the course of evolution and selection. In the present study, a genome-wide CNV detection based on the PorcineSNP60 BeadChip was performed in 14 individual selected from diverse populations, including six types of Chinese indigenous breeds, one Asian wild boar population, as well as three modern commercial foreign breeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Zhang & Plastow () reported that the average LD in improved pig breeds extended to 1–3 cM – much larger than those observed in humans (<30 kb) and cattle (<100 kb), but less than in sheep (<10 cM).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%