2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic diversity of antimicrobial-resistant and Shiga toxin gene-harboring non-O157 Escherichia coli from dairy calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the proportion of positive samples in BTM was very low (3.4% of stx-positive samples), while the proportion on the RMF of the same herds were significantly higher (41.3% of stx-positive samples), as well as in calf feces. These differences were not unexpected [11,27,38,39,42], and may be explained in the following way:…”
Section: Stec Prevalence In the Different Matricesmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the proportion of positive samples in BTM was very low (3.4% of stx-positive samples), while the proportion on the RMF of the same herds were significantly higher (41.3% of stx-positive samples), as well as in calf feces. These differences were not unexpected [11,27,38,39,42], and may be explained in the following way:…”
Section: Stec Prevalence In the Different Matricesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The presence of STEC in calf has been reported in few studies [39][40][41], but at best of our knowledge, this approach was never thought as a way to identify potential vector animals within and between herds, and a potential critical point for control measures. The availability of new commercial molecular assays allows to identify non-O157 serotypes in milk and milk products which simplify and make more efficient the detection process.…”
Section: Aims Of the Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these differences were expected [ 11 , 28 , 37 , 42 , 43 ] and may be explained as follows: Milk: 25 mL of raw milk are sampled from the bulk tank, which is capable of holding 150–10,000 liters of milk at 4 °C, which results in a poor detection level, particularly when the prevalence of STEC-positive cows is very low and/or when milking practices are optimal. Milk Filters: with this type of sample, it is easier to find positivity because the main task of the filter is to block and retain any type of fecal or litter debris coming from the milking routine, and all the milk passes through the filter; therefore, there is no dilution effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of STEC in calves has been reported in a few studies [ 37 , 38 , 39 ], but, to the best of our knowledge, this approach was never thought to be a way to identify potential vector animals within and between herds and a potential critical point for control measures. The availability of new commercial molecular assays allows identification of non-O157 serotypes in milk and milk products, simplifying and making the detection process more efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli are frequently isolated from dairy cow and calf feces, unpasteurized cow's milk, and culled dairy cow beef and are a major component of the suite of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) carried by young calves [1][2][3]. A minority of these E. coli are enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) Shiga toxin-encoding strains that can cause moderate to severe gastrointestinal disease, septicemia, hemolytic uremia syndrome (HUS), chronic sequelae, and possibly death [4,5]. However, E. coli is highly diverse, with many suites of virulence and fitness factors (VFFs) that can cause both mild to severe gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs) and meningitis [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%