“…Accordingly, considerable empirical work has tested whether sexual selection in males can indeed increase selection against deleterious mutations and thereby aid population persistence (Cally et al, 2019; Rowe & Rundle, 2021). Results are mixed: some experimental studies on a variety of species, for example, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster or the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini , report positive effects of sexual selection on population fitness (Almbro & Simmons, 2014; Godwin et al, 2020; Grieshop et al, 2016; Hollis et al, 2009; Jarzebowska & Radwan, 2010; Lumley et al, 2015; Parrett et al, 2022; Radwan, 2004), while other studies in the same or similar species did not find such effects (Allen et al, 2017; Arbuthnott & Rundle, 2012; Chenoweth et al, 2015; Hollis & Houle, 2011; Plesnar‐Bielak et al, 2011, 2020; Prokop et al, 2019). Meanwhile, studies of wild populations have mostly found negative effects of sexual selection on population persistence (Bro‐Jørgensen, 2014; Doherty et al, 2003; Martins et al, 2018; McLain et al, 1995; McLain & Vives, 1998; Morrow & Pitcher, 2003), but some studies report no effect (Morrow & Fricke, 2004; Prinzing et al, 2002) or positive effects (Parrett et al, 2019).…”