2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.03.008
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MM, as in other cancers, multiple heterogeneous clones coexist, each with its own set of genetic and chromosomal abnormalities. As the disease progresses from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to smoldering myeloma, MM, and to plasma cell leukemia, it proliferates and develops a number of secondary CAs (Sawyer ; Keats et al, ; Morgan et al, ; Szalat and Munshi, ). Thus, it is reasonable to consume that a specific combination of abnormalities will have a greater prognostic impact than any abnormality analyzed individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MM, as in other cancers, multiple heterogeneous clones coexist, each with its own set of genetic and chromosomal abnormalities. As the disease progresses from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to smoldering myeloma, MM, and to plasma cell leukemia, it proliferates and develops a number of secondary CAs (Sawyer ; Keats et al, ; Morgan et al, ; Szalat and Munshi, ). Thus, it is reasonable to consume that a specific combination of abnormalities will have a greater prognostic impact than any abnormality analyzed individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple myeloma remains incurable, despite recent treatment advances (1). There is mounting evidence that targeting intercellular communication between malignant plasma cells or between malignant cells and host cells may enhance therapeutic outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While promising, the use of NGS for clone tracking‐based detection of MM does not provide clinicians with information about genetic abnormalities associated with disease in a particular patient. Moreover, evolving clonal heterogeneity of the disease and/or clonal processes that often accelerate with age (such as monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis, or clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential) may complicate interpretation of results obtained with clone‐tracking techniques, such as NGS (Mailankody et al , ; Szalat & Munshi, , ; Nishihori et al , ). Finally, current NGS testing works best with invasive bone marrow aspirates and may not have sufficient sensitivity to detect MRD in serum, plasma or peripheral blood (Mailankody et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%