2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0219635214400081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic instantiation of consciousness in neurons through a biophoton field theory

Abstract: A theoretical framework is developed based on the premise that brains evolved into su±ciently complex adaptive systems capable of instantiating genomic consciousness through self-awareness and complex interactions that recognize qualitatively the controlling factors of biological processes. Furthermore, our hypothesis assumes that the collective interactions in neurons yield macroergic e®ects, which can produce su±ciently strong electric energy¯elds for electronic excitations to take place on the surface of en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My main goal was to argue that future progress in this field is likely to benefit from a paradigmal shift toward cell biology. In this context, it may be interesting to bring attention to theoretical studies linking the mechanisms of cognitive functions, including human consciousness, with quantum processes within brain neurons (Cacha and Poznanski 2014; Hagan and others 2002; Hameroff 2001, 2014; Liberman and others 1989). Unlike theoretical analysis of neural networks, these studies remain outside the mainstream of cognitive neuroscience.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My main goal was to argue that future progress in this field is likely to benefit from a paradigmal shift toward cell biology. In this context, it may be interesting to bring attention to theoretical studies linking the mechanisms of cognitive functions, including human consciousness, with quantum processes within brain neurons (Cacha and Poznanski 2014; Hagan and others 2002; Hameroff 2001, 2014; Liberman and others 1989). Unlike theoretical analysis of neural networks, these studies remain outside the mainstream of cognitive neuroscience.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 One hypothesis is based on the idea that the collective interaction of electric excitation that occurs on the endogenous cell surface through intrinsic protein structures (alpha-helical integral protein), can form an electron-soliton, that is, a solitary self-reinforcing electric wave; propagation of such an additional wave allows the transfer of energy to the DNA (DNA is a liquid crystal), inducing conformational changes in it that will produce biophotons. 28 , 42 The biophotons thus produced, are sent along the axonal and neuronal ramifications, between and within the neurons, and throughout the central nervous system. 42 The neurons contain various light-sensitive neurotransmitters (tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and other molecules), and it is difficult to imagine that the nervous system is not affected by the phenomenon of UPE and that such conduction of photons does not transport encoded information.…”
Section: Biophotons and Cellular Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 28 , 42 The biophotons thus produced, are sent along the axonal and neuronal ramifications, between and within the neurons, and throughout the central nervous system. 42 The neurons contain various light-sensitive neurotransmitters (tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and other molecules), and it is difficult to imagine that the nervous system is not affected by the phenomenon of UPE and that such conduction of photons does not transport encoded information. 26 , 43 This conduction mechanism is probably influenced by the orientation of the nerve fiber, and occurs with greater emphasis in the white matter of the brain.…”
Section: Biophotons and Cellular Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In field theories in physics, however, each point of a particular region of the presumed space-time continuum, as well as all interactions between elementary objects, are objectively measurable and accounted for mathematically. This cannot be claimed by any current theory of consciousness, including the field theories (e.g., Köhler, 1940;Lashley et al, 1951;Fingelkurts and Fingelkurts, 2002;John, 2002;McFadden, 2002;Cacha and Poznanski, 2014). These will not be reviewed in detail again here, as an excellent review has been provided earlier by Pockett (2013) earlier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In field theories of consciousness (e.g., Köhler, 1940 ; Cacha and Poznanski, 2014 among others), the latter is conceived in terms of a field in the sense in which it is used in quantum or particle physics, where the notion of “field” applies to all fundamental forces and relationships between elementary particles within a unifying theoretical framework where the forces lead to energy fields that occupy space-time and mediate interactions between elementary particles. In field theories of consciousness the latter is, similarly, seen as having duration and extension in space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%