2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cj.2022.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic prediction of Fusarium head blight resistance in early stages using advanced breeding lines in hard winter wheat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be used either in MAB programs aimed at developing wheat varieties providing tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses under study or subjected to fine mapping to identify key genes involved in tolerance against multiple abiotic stresses in wheat, as proposed recently for multiple biotic stress resistance in soybean 101 . Markers flanking these MQTLs may be utilized in improving the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for multiple abiotic stress tolerance in wheat 102,103 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be used either in MAB programs aimed at developing wheat varieties providing tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses under study or subjected to fine mapping to identify key genes involved in tolerance against multiple abiotic stresses in wheat, as proposed recently for multiple biotic stress resistance in soybean 101 . Markers flanking these MQTLs may be utilized in improving the prediction accuracy of genomic selection for multiple abiotic stress tolerance in wheat 102,103 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, evaluation of individual genotypes with their overall genetic merit toward resistance to the disease through genomic prediction models is a more efficient and feasible approach. In addition, the difficulty of phenotypic screening of the disease in both controlled conditions and field trials (Zhang et al 2022 ) makes genomic selection the best option in FHB resistance breeding. Previous studies have shown the potential of genomic prediction in FHB resistance in wheat (Arruda et al 2015 ; Dong et al 2018 ; Herter et al 2019 ; Rutkoski et al 2012 ; Verges et al 2020 ; Zhang et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the HWW cultivars from the US Great Plains, including the SDSU winter wheat program, do not carry Fhb1 likely due to yield drag, and ‘TAM 205’ is the only released HWW variety carrying Fhb1 to date ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Fortunately, several HWW cultivars including Everest, Overland, Lyman, Heyne, Century, and Hondo that exhibit moderate FHB resistance but do not carry Fhb1 have been released in the US HWW region ( Jin et al, 2013 ; Bai et al, 2018 ; Clinesmith et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ), showing the importance of the native FHB resistance in the regional wheat breeding programs. Further, various studies have successfully identified QTLs for native resistance using cultivars such as ‘Art,’ Everest, and Lyman ( Clinesmith et al, 2019 ; Hashimi, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, only a few QTLs with a major effect on FHB resistance, in particular Fhb1 , have been successfully employed in wheat breeding programs ( Bai et al, 2018 ). Contrarily, the majority of the germplasm from the hard winter wheat region of the US relies upon the variation in FHB resistance from native sources including cultivars ‘Everest,’ ‘Overland,’ ‘Lyman,’ and ‘Expedition’ ( Clinesmith et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). However, the identification of genomic regions underlying native resistance and the development of reliable markers are essential for pyramiding those QTLs to maintain an effective level of FHB resistance in locally adapted wheat backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%