2019
DOI: 10.17660/ejhs.2019/84.4.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic predictions in diploid Actinidia chinensis (kiwifruit)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we have shown the potential of using different variance co-variance relationship methodologies in A. arguta breeding programmes. Overall, the results of six traits considered in a marker-based relationship matrix showed a positive correlation of predictions to mean observations, indicating a better representative genetic architecture of genome-wide marker coverage using a multiplex PCR and new generation sequencing combination approach, compared with previous studies of other Actinidia species (Datson et al 2017 ; Cheng et al 2019 ). We were able to differentiate the effects of different relationship methodologies and ploidy to the best linear unbiased prediction in the parental generation and the progeny population, progeny both with and without phenotypic observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we have shown the potential of using different variance co-variance relationship methodologies in A. arguta breeding programmes. Overall, the results of six traits considered in a marker-based relationship matrix showed a positive correlation of predictions to mean observations, indicating a better representative genetic architecture of genome-wide marker coverage using a multiplex PCR and new generation sequencing combination approach, compared with previous studies of other Actinidia species (Datson et al 2017 ; Cheng et al 2019 ). We were able to differentiate the effects of different relationship methodologies and ploidy to the best linear unbiased prediction in the parental generation and the progeny population, progeny both with and without phenotypic observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In particular, the selection of male parents requires progeny testing, as they do not provide phenotypic information on their genetic background, for the breeder. Recently, genomic methods have been developed to enable this prediction (Testolin 2011 ; Datson et al 2017 ; Cheng et al 2019 ). In polyploids with their multiple homologous chromosome sets, allele dosage information is crucial to estimating marker-based additive variance–covariance relationships between individuals to predict breeding values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we have shown the potential of using different variance co-variance relationship methodologies in A. arguta breeding programmes. Overall, the results of six traits considered in a markerbased relationship matrix showed a positive correlation of predictions to mean observations, indicating a better representative genetic architecture of genome-wide marker coverage using a multiplex PCR and new generation sequencing combination approach, compared with previous studies of other Actinidia species (Datson et al 2017;Cheng et al 2019). We were able to differentiate the effects of different relationship methodologies and ploidy to the best linear unbiased prediction in the parental generation and the progeny population, progeny both with and without phenotypic observation.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 73%