2017
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic risk prediction of aromatase inhibitor‐related arthralgia in patients with breast cancer using a novel machine‐learning algorithm

Abstract: Many breast cancer (BC) patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) develop aromatase inhibitor‐related arthralgia (AIA). Candidate gene studies to identify AIA risk are limited in scope. We evaluated the potential of a novel analytic algorithm (NAA) to predict AIA using germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) data obtained before treatment initiation. Systematic chart review of 700 AI‐treated patients with stage I‐III BC identified asymptomatic patients (n = 39) and those with clinically significa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and those with clinically significant aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgia (AIA) resulting in aromatase inhibitor termination or therapy switch (n = 123) was performed. 14) This SNP group predicted AIA occurrence with a maximum accuracy of 75.93%. In these studies, drug-induced side effects have been predicted by machine learning using information including gene polymorphisms with an accuracy rate in the range of 70% to 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and those with clinically significant aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgia (AIA) resulting in aromatase inhibitor termination or therapy switch (n = 123) was performed. 14) This SNP group predicted AIA occurrence with a maximum accuracy of 75.93%. In these studies, drug-induced side effects have been predicted by machine learning using information including gene polymorphisms with an accuracy rate in the range of 70% to 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Future studies can enhance the performance of ML algorithms through incorporation of additional clinical data, such as lifestyle, medications, breast images, exact histology of benign breast diseases and co-morbidities. 36,37,53 Future studies can also include resource rearrangement involving health policymakers and other stakeholders, in terms of cost-effectiveness and adaptability in different clinical settings. A prospective clinical trial would provide more functional and extended evaluation of the performance of ML algorithms, and findings can be compared with ongoing personalised breast cancer screening trials like 'My PeBS' and 'WISDOM'.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 A series of ML techniques, including our own work, have been developed and used in breast cancer prediction and prognosis, demonstrating that the application of ML methods could improve the prediction accuracy of cancer susceptibility, recurrence and survival models. [34][35][36][37][38][39] Previous studies presented the discriminatory accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and calibration performance of different ML algorithms. However, clinical utility, in terms of potential clinical consequences of using new ML prediction models, is rarely examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simplified version of this algorithm has been previously used to assess the genomic risk of aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgia in patients with breast cancer using SNPs [17], to perform the integration of genomic data in CLL patients [18,19], and to predict post-radiotherapy fatigue development in cancer patients [20]. The rationale of the HS algorithm is completely different from FRS; however, the purpose is the same: exploring the uncertainty space intrinsic to phenotype prediction problems.…”
Section: Sampling Algorithms Fisher's Ratio Sampler (Frs)mentioning
confidence: 99%