2017
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.06.0496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic Selection for Yield and Seed Protein Content in Soybean: A Study of Breeding Program Data and Assessment of Prediction Accuracy

Abstract: Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a major crop with high seed protein content. Genomic selection is expected to be a valuable tool in improving the efficiency of breeding programs, especially for complex traits such as yield. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of genomic selection for yield and seed protein content in a soybean breeding population. Having a structured population, we compared genomic prediction accuracy obtained using models calibrated across or within two subpopulations: early lines a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duhnen et al (2017) found similar results using G-BLUP cross-validations to the values reported in this study for yield (0.49) and protein (0.67) (Table 3), with prediction accuracies for yield ranging from 0.45 to 0.63 and for protein from 0.45 to 0.59. In this study, four selection methods (PS, BayesB, G-BLUP, and Epistacy) were evaluated for soybean yield, oleic acid, linolenic acid, protein, and oil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Duhnen et al (2017) found similar results using G-BLUP cross-validations to the values reported in this study for yield (0.49) and protein (0.67) (Table 3), with prediction accuracies for yield ranging from 0.45 to 0.63 and for protein from 0.45 to 0.59. In this study, four selection methods (PS, BayesB, G-BLUP, and Epistacy) were evaluated for soybean yield, oleic acid, linolenic acid, protein, and oil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is commonly done by subsetting a portion of the population to serve as a training set, predicting the performance of another portion of the population, and then evaluating the predictions using cross-validations (Duhnen et al, 2017). Many GS studies have sought to evaluate predictions in one growing season, without testing the performance of predictions over time.…”
Section: Selection Methods and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With both methods (RR and TP), we observed high prediction accuracies ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (Arruda et al., ; Duhnen et al., ; Kristensen et al., ; Leplat, Jensen, & Madsen, ). While similar accuracies have been reported by other studies for complex traits, it is important to note that the current study utilized a diversity panel with considerable population stratification and the prediction models did not account for population structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With both methods (RR and TP), we observed high prediction accuracies ranging from 0.4 to 0.6 (Arruda et al, 2015;Duhnen et al, 2017;Kristensen et al, 2018;Leplat, Jensen, & Madsen, 2016).…”
Section: Advantages Of Rr Over Univariate Genomic Predictionmentioning
confidence: 95%