2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-016-0392-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic selection to resistance to Stenocarpella maydis in maize lines using DArTseq markers

Abstract: BackgroundThe identification of lines resistant to ear diseases is of great importance in maize breeding because such diseases directly interfere with kernel quality and yield. Among these diseases, ear rot disease is widely relevant due to significant decrease in grain yield. Ear rot may be caused by the fungus Stenocarpella maydi; however, little information about genetic resistance to this pathogen is available in maize, mainly related to candidate genes in genome. In order to exploit this genome informatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In maize, prediction accuracy of GS among the full-sibs was more accurate than unrelated crosses (Riedelsheimer et al, 2013). Among the GS models, rrBLUP and BSSV were found equally efficient in identifying the Stenocarpella maydis resistant maize inbred lines using DArTseq markers (Pedroso et al, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In maize, prediction accuracy of GS among the full-sibs was more accurate than unrelated crosses (Riedelsheimer et al, 2013). Among the GS models, rrBLUP and BSSV were found equally efficient in identifying the Stenocarpella maydis resistant maize inbred lines using DArTseq markers (Pedroso et al, 2016). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique can detect both SNPs and DArTs using cost-effective and efficient strategies (RAMAN et al, 2014). Due to its rapid, high throughput and cost-effective characters, DArT-seq has been widely used for genetic diversity studies, linkage mapping, QTL identification in biparental mapping population and genome wide association studies (GWAS) in wheat (LI et al, 2015;BALOCH et al, 2017;KAUR et al, 2017) and many other crops over the previous four years (COURTOIS et al, 2013;SANTOS et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed linear models, hierarchical Bayesian models with informative priors, kernel methods, and neural nets are modeling approaches used for GP, but minimal differences in predictive performance are typically seen across these approaches (de los Campos et al 2013;Heslot et al 2015;dos Santos et al 2016a). This outcome may be explained by the high density of covariates (SNP markers) compared to the population size used for training the models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%