2018
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture8070089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics-Assisted Breeding in the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB)

Abstract: Breeding in the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) targets highly diverse biotic and abiotic constraints, whilst meeting complex end-user quality preferences to improve livelihoods of beneficiaries in developing countries. Achieving breeding targets and increasing the rate of genetic gains for these vegetatively propagated crops, with long breeding cycles, and genomes with high heterozygosity and different ploidy levels, is challenging. Cheaper sequencing opens possibilities to apply gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potato breeding has focused on increasing yields and disease tolerance, while other traits preferred by men and women farmers and markets are given a low priority. Friedmann et al, (2018), suggest that it is important to understand any gender differences in trait preferences because breeding programmes that do not take these differences into account may exacerbate gender inequalities and result in negative outcomes for women. Tufan et al, (2018) note that there is lack of information and tools to understand gender differences in trait preferences an understanding of these gender differences should influence breeding decisions1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potato breeding has focused on increasing yields and disease tolerance, while other traits preferred by men and women farmers and markets are given a low priority. Friedmann et al, (2018), suggest that it is important to understand any gender differences in trait preferences because breeding programmes that do not take these differences into account may exacerbate gender inequalities and result in negative outcomes for women. Tufan et al, (2018) note that there is lack of information and tools to understand gender differences in trait preferences an understanding of these gender differences should influence breeding decisions1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years many large‐scale efforts have sought to further understand these crops using genome sequences (Xu et al , ; D'Hont et al , ; Wang et al , ; Tamiru et al , ; Yang et al , ; Li et al , ) and genome diversity studies (Bredeson et al , ; Hardigan et al , ; Nyine et al , ; Christelová et al , ; Muñoz‐Rodríguez et al , ; Němečková et al , ), genetic selection (Wolfe et al , ), molecular markers (QTLs) (Monden and Tahara, ; Kim et al , ; Sharma and Bryan, ), and comparative transcriptome resources (Kundapura Venkataramana et al , ; Sarah et al , ; van Wesemael et al , ; Cenci et al , ) widely developed alongside morphologic, agronomic and phenotypic classifications (Oliveira et al , ; Rahajeng and Rahayuningsih, ; Dépigny et al , ; Girma et al , ; van Wesemael et al , ). The progress of the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (http://www.rtb.cgiar.org), applying genomics‐assisted breeding to RTBs, has recently been reviewed (Friedmann et al , ). Although typically in the early stages, the authors noted that success will be dependent upon the quality of phenotypic characterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the staple food crop cassava, in which phenotypic selection alone is inefficient and heritability of desired traits is low, genomic selection has been shown to accurately predict yield traits in multiple trials (de Andrade, Sousa, Oliveira, Resende, & Azevedo, 2019). Nevertheless, the presence of polyploidy and high heterozygosity in many crop genomes is currently limiting the widespread application of genomic selection (Friedmann et al., 2018).…”
Section: Techniques For Plant Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%