Genosensors for differential detection of Zika virus

Alzate, Diana; Cajigas, Sebastián; Robledo, Sara M.; Muskus, Carlos; Orozco, Jahir

doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120648

Cited by 42 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Colorimetric format. Electrochemical format Electrochemical format Genosensors R1: 32 pmol L-1 Genosensors R2: 9 pmol L-1 Genosensors R1: 0.7 pmol L-1 Genosensors R2: 3 pmol L-1 [77] Zika virus Chikungunya viruses -a Chikungunya viruses -b Multiplex RT-qPCR 100 copies 5 copies 50 copies [78] Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus Immuno-chromatographic strip 1:50 [79] H1N1 of influenza A virus H3N2 of influenza A virus CdSe/CdS/ZnS quantum dot-linked rapid fluorescent immunochromatographic test 28.37 34.48 [80] Epstein-Barr virus Electrochemical detection 0.46 fM [81] Pseudorabies virus Porcine circovirus 3 SYBR green I-based duplex real-time PCR 37.8 copies/μL, 30.6 copies/μL [82] Classic swine fever virus Porcine circovirus 3 SYBR green I-based duplex real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR 23 copies/μL 36 copies/μL [83] Ebola virus Rolling circle amplification of Ebola virus and fluorescence detection based on graphene oxide 1.4 pM. [84] Ebola virus Microfluidic sample preparation multiplex 0.021 pfu/mL [85] Ebola virus Electrochemical DNA biosensor 4.7nm [86] Ebola virus RT-PCR 10 molecules/...…”

Section: Current Scenario In the Detection Of Virusesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical investigations for COVID-19 detection-A comparison with other viral detection methods

Bukkitgar

Shetti

Aminabhavi³

2021

Chemical Engineering Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Current Scenario In the Detection Of Virusesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical investigations for COVID-19 detection-A comparison with other viral detection methods

Bukkitgar

Shetti

Aminabhavi³

2021

Chemical Engineering Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), a biosensor is a self-contained integral device that can provide specific quantitative/semi-quantitative analytical information using a biological recognition element (biochemical receptor) in direct spatial contact with a transducer element [49]. Biosensors have been developed with a variety of biochemical receptors, including enzymes, proteins, antibodies, nucleic acids, cells, tissues, or receptor molecules [50][51][52][53]. The bioreceptor interacts selectively with a target analyte, generating a biochemical response that the transducer converts into a measurable signal, which is analyte concentration-dependent [49].…”

Section: Nanobioengineered Electrochemical Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical Biosensors for Determination of Colorectal Tumor Biomarkers

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The accurate determination of specific tumor markers associated with cancer with non-invasive or minimally invasive procedures is the most promising approach to improve the long-term survival of cancer patients and fight against the high incidence and mortality of this disease. Quantification of biomarkers at different stages of the disease can lead to an appropriate and instantaneous therapeutic action. In this context, the determination of biomarkers by electrochemical biosensors is at the forefront of cancer diagnosis research because of their unique features such as their versatility, fast response, accurate quantification, and amenability for multiplexing and miniaturization. In this review, after briefly discussing the relevant aspects and current challenges in the determination of colorectal tumor markers, it will critically summarize the development of electrochemical biosensors to date to this aim, highlighting the enormous potential of these devices to be incorporated into the clinical practice. Finally, it will focus on the remaining challenges and opportunities to bring electrochemical biosensors to the point-of-care testing.

show abstract

“…It is a positive, single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus with a casing, rendering it a close relation to the Spondweni virus. Fast and severe detection platforms are urgently needed for the Zika virus [ [105] , [106] , [107] ]. Afsahi et al.…”

Section: Application Of Carbon Nanomaterials For Viral Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of carbon nanomaterials in human virus detection

Ehtesabi

2020

Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human-pathogenic viruses are still a chief reason for illness and death on the globe, as epitomized by the COVID-19 pandemic instigated by a coronavirus in 2020. Multiple novel sensors have been invented because diseases must be detected and diagnosed as early as possible, and recognition methods have to be carried out with minimal invasivity. Sensors have been particularly developed focusing on miniaturization by the use of nanomaterials for fabricating nanosensors. The nano-sized nature of nanomaterials and their exclusive optical, electronical, magnetical, and mechanical attributes can enhance patient care through the use of sensors with minimal invasivity and extreme sensitivity. Amongst the nanomaterials utilized for fabricating nano-sensors, carbon-based nanomaterials are promising as these sensors respond better to signals in various sensing settings. This review provides an overview of the recent developments in carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition based on the biomarkers that arise from the infection, the nucleic acids from the viruses, and the entire virus. The role of carbon nanomaterials is highlighted by the improvement of sensor and recognition functionality. The Dengue virus, Ebola virus, Hepatits virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influenza virus, Zika virus and Adenovirus are the virus types reviewed to illustrate the implementation of the techniques. Finally, the drawbacks and advantages of carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition are identified and discussed.

show abstract

Genosensors for differential detection of Zika virus

Cited by 42 publications

References 30 publications

Electrochemical investigations for COVID-19 detection-A comparison with other viral detection methods

Electrochemical investigations for COVID-19 detection-A comparison with other viral detection methods

Electrochemical Biosensors for Determination of Colorectal Tumor Biomarkers

Application of carbon nanomaterials in human virus detection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About