2012
DOI: 10.15381/rivep.v23i3.910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GENOTIPICACIÓN, EVALUACIÓN TOXIGÉNICA in vitro Y SENSIBILIDAD A ANTIBIÓTICOS DE CEPAS DE Escherichia coli AISLADAS DE CASOS DIARREICOS Y FATALES EN ALPACAS NEONATAS.

Abstract: RESUMENSe analizaron 27 hisopos diarreicos rectales y 24 contenidos patológicos del intestino de 51 alpacas de 1 a 7 semanas de edad para aislar y genotificar Escherichia coli, y caracterizar su sensibilidad antimicrobiana. Los aislamientos de E. coli fueron genotipificados por PCR múltiple para detectar genes de virulencia: stx1 y stx2 (shigatoxina 1 y 2), eae (intimina) y bfp (Bundle-Forming Pili), lt (toxina termolábil), sta y stb (toxina termoestable A y B), presentes en E. coli enterohemorrágica (EHEC), e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, BPS could be an important source of pathogens to people. In this context, reports from BPS estimate STEC prevalence between 0.2 and 74% in dairy cattle ( 22 ), over 70% in sheep and goats ( 23 ), and even a 4% in captive wild birds ( 24 ), with several other reports in different animal species with close in-contact with humans ( 25 , 26 ). Information about positivity to STEC in Latin America is scarce, but a report described STEC isolation in alpacas, raised under small farmer condition in Peru ( 25 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, BPS could be an important source of pathogens to people. In this context, reports from BPS estimate STEC prevalence between 0.2 and 74% in dairy cattle ( 22 ), over 70% in sheep and goats ( 23 ), and even a 4% in captive wild birds ( 24 ), with several other reports in different animal species with close in-contact with humans ( 25 , 26 ). Information about positivity to STEC in Latin America is scarce, but a report described STEC isolation in alpacas, raised under small farmer condition in Peru ( 25 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Altos niveles de sensibilidad fueron observados para trimetoprim (98%), gentamicina (95%), fosfomicina (88%), ceftadizima (78%), ciprofloxacino (74%), ceftriazona (72%), oxitetraciclina (63%) y amikacina (59%), coincidiendo con otros estudios de susceptibilidad antibiótica de cepas de E. coli patogénicas y no patogénicas (Luna et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Dependiendo del tipo de infección, los antimicrobianos sulfatrimetoprim, fluoroquinolonas y cefalosporinas de tercera generación se recomiendan generalmente para el tratamiento de infecciones causadas por E. coli no STEC (E. coli productora de toxina shiga) (Thielman y Guerrant, 1999 (Iroha et al, 2012). En uno de los pocos estudios en CSA se reporta que el 80 y 25% de cepas de E. coli aisladas de crías de alpacas con cuadros diarreicos y casos fatales demostraron resistencia a la neomicina y oxitetraciclina, respectivamente (Luna, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In cattle, the prevalence of STEC O157 is reported to range from 0 to 71%, and in some herds the infection rate is as high as 100% [36]. The prevalence has been described as ranging between 0.2 and 74% in dairy cattle [36,37], as over 70% in sheep and goats [38] and as 4% in captive wild birds [39], with several other reports of its presence in other animal species that have close contact with humans [40,41]. In contrast, the prevalence of S. enterica at the BPS level is reported to range from 3.5% to 31.0% in hens reared under these low-tech production systems [42,43], demonstrating that these animals are not part of any surveillance system in the region.…”
Section: Shiga Toxin-producing E Coli and Salmonella Entericamentioning
confidence: 99%