1991
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(91)90038-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxic activity of potassium permanganate in acidic solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were comparable, indicating that healthy persons use the same repair mechanism, no matter if they are professionally exposed to ionising radiation or not. High standard deviation, also seen in the results of other author (DeMeo et al, 1991;Maluf et al, 2001;Maluf, 2004;Tice, 1995), implicated on the influence of interindividual differences. Since the comet assay measures primary DNA damage after the exposure, those results can be a marker of different gene activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our results were comparable, indicating that healthy persons use the same repair mechanism, no matter if they are professionally exposed to ionising radiation or not. High standard deviation, also seen in the results of other author (DeMeo et al, 1991;Maluf et al, 2001;Maluf, 2004;Tice, 1995), implicated on the influence of interindividual differences. Since the comet assay measures primary DNA damage after the exposure, those results can be a marker of different gene activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The alkaline Comet assay was performed as described previously [Singh et al, 1988;De Meo et al, 1991]. Briefly, 20 ll of blood were mixed with 1 ml of RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 2 mM L-glutamate.…”
Section: Alkaline Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells for comet analysis were exposed to the indicated drug concentrations at 37°C in the dark and analyzed immediately according to previously published procedures (21,23,42). Image analysis was performed by using Komet 5.5 software (Kinetic Imaging, Nottingham, U.K.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%