2022
DOI: 10.2131/jts.47.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity and mutagenicity evaluation of isoquercitrin-γ-cyclodextrin molecular inclusion complex using Ames test and a combined micronucleus and comet assay in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te spectroscopic evaluation of studied favonoid-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes revealed the successful formulation of these compositions [22,23]. Acute, subchronic, Ames, micronucleus, and comet assays support the safe use of these favonoid-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes as food, food additives, and natural pharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients [24][25][26]. Also, the bioavailability studies in animals and humans revealed that these favonoidcyclodextrin inclusion complexes are highly bioavailable and could be efective functional favonoid ingredients with potential health benefts in humans [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Te spectroscopic evaluation of studied favonoid-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes revealed the successful formulation of these compositions [22,23]. Acute, subchronic, Ames, micronucleus, and comet assays support the safe use of these favonoid-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes as food, food additives, and natural pharmaceutical and nutraceutical ingredients [24][25][26]. Also, the bioavailability studies in animals and humans revealed that these favonoidcyclodextrin inclusion complexes are highly bioavailable and could be efective functional favonoid ingredients with potential health benefts in humans [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…With oral administration to mice and rats, quercetin consistently did not induce any significant changes in several mutagenicity/ genotoxicity endpoints, such as micronuclei, chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, unscheduled DNA synthesis and alkali-labile DNA damage in somatic cells [14]. Furthermore, based on the Ames test and combined in vivo micronucleus and comet assay, there was no induction of in vivo genotoxic potential or indication of any oxidative DNA damage, suggesting the absence of mutagenicity and genotoxicity potential of the isoquercitrin-γ-cyclodextrin (IQC-γCD) inclusion complex in rat liver tissues [15]. On the other hand, a clinical study [16] indicated that total sperm motility was significantly inhibited following exposure to 100, 200 and 400 μM quercetin for 6 and 12 hours in a dose-dependent manner, as compared to the controls (p < 0.05), suggesting that quercetin inhibits sperm functions.…”
Section: Biosafety and Toxicity Profiles Of Quercetinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any chemical substance (compounds) that is capable of causing the organism to mutate is considered mutagenic and possibly carcinogenic [2,3]. Evaluation of herbal medicine products which contains polychemical substances (compounds) for their mutagenic potential has not been a common practice Worldwide but of late, several products have been evaluated for their mutagenic potentials [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%