2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity evaluation of individuals working with photocopying machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although consistently positive results were obtained with Giemsa (20,21,29,31,38), negative results were obtained in most studies with DNAspecific stains. We found in total 24 articles in which negative results were obtained in smokers with Feulgen, whereas an increase in micronuclei frequencies was reported in six articles only (6,22,23,(39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although consistently positive results were obtained with Giemsa (20,21,29,31,38), negative results were obtained in most studies with DNAspecific stains. We found in total 24 articles in which negative results were obtained in smokers with Feulgen, whereas an increase in micronuclei frequencies was reported in six articles only (6,22,23,(39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…toner emissions during their work found genotoxic effects in lymphocytes and buccal mucosa cells [Goud et al, 2001[Goud et al, , 2004Gadhia et al, 2005]. All these findings must be interpreted with caution, because only a few toner powders were examined, mostly in an unsystematic fashion, and the results are inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms such as nonallergic rhinitis, sore throat, asthma, and pseudo allergic inflammation of the respiratory tract, irritation of the skin and eyes, headache, and sick building syndrome (SBS) seem to be linked to these emissions [Gallardo et al, 1994;Armbruster et al, 1996;Rabe et al, 2002;Gminski and Mersch-Sundermann, 2006;Jaakkola et al, 2007] Recently, it has been shown that workers with toner dust exposure from laser printers can develop submesothelial deposition of carbon nanoparticles in the peritoneum [Theegarten et al, 2010]. Additionally, copyshop workers possess significantly higher chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes or DNA-damage in the buccal cells, indicating the influence of either toner dusts or laser printer and photocopier emissions [Goud et al, 2004;Gadhia et al, 2005;Gminski and Mersch-Sundermann, 2006;Kleinsorge et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%