2019
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy9120867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-Environment Interaction: Trade-Offs between the Agronomic Performance and Stability of Dual-Purpose Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Genotypes in Senegal

Abstract: Introducing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes into new environments is necessary for expanding the production of food and fuel, but these efforts are complicated by significant genotype × environment interactions that can reduce their effectiveness. This study set out to thoroughly analyze genotype × environment interactions and assess trade-offs between the agronomic performance and the stability of grain and biomass yields of ten contrasting genotypes under Sudano-Sahelian conditions. Experiments… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, rainfall and temperature during the experiment appear to be the major factors explaining the variation in genotype responses, contrary to Ndiaye et al [42], who stated that soil fertility, rainfall, and sowing date were the discriminant factors of sorghum genotypes. Line 22 appears to be adapted to a wide range of environments (more than environment alone) with different pedoclimatic characteristics (Tables 2 and 3); this line has a favorable GY performance in semi-arid and sub-humid regions.…”
Section: Variance and Ammi Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Overall, rainfall and temperature during the experiment appear to be the major factors explaining the variation in genotype responses, contrary to Ndiaye et al [42], who stated that soil fertility, rainfall, and sowing date were the discriminant factors of sorghum genotypes. Line 22 appears to be adapted to a wide range of environments (more than environment alone) with different pedoclimatic characteristics (Tables 2 and 3); this line has a favorable GY performance in semi-arid and sub-humid regions.…”
Section: Variance and Ammi Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Theses varieties differ in terms of days to maturity (90 to 128 days for maturity), height (120 to 450 cm height), response to inputs (hybrid vs. open pollinated varieties caudatum or guinea) and yield (2 to 4.5 t ha −1 ). These varieties are widely cultivated by the farmers due to their adaptability and agronomic characteristics [39][40][41].…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These varieties differ in terms of days to ma-turity (90 to 128 days for maturity), height (120 to 450 cm height), response to inputs (hy-brid vs. open pollinated varieties caudatum or guinea), and yield (2 to 4.5 t ha −1 ). These varieties are widely cultivated by the farmers due to their adaptability and agronomic characteristics [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%