2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbg.12358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype imputation accuracy in multiple equine breeds from medium‐ to high‐density genotypes

Abstract: Genotype imputation is now a key component of genomic analyses as it increases the density of available genotypes within a population. However, many factors can influence imputation accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the accuracy of imputation of high‐density genotypes (Affymetrix Axiom Equine genotyping array, 670,806 SNPs) from two moderate‐density genotypes (Illumina Equine SNP50 BeadChip, 54,602 SNPs and Illumina Equine SNP70 BeadChip, 65,157 SNPs), using single‐breed or multiple‐bre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2014 ; McCoy & McCue 2014 ; Schaefer et al . 2017 ; Chassier et al . 2018 ), cattle ( Hozé et al .2013 ; Pausch etal .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…2014 ; McCoy & McCue 2014 ; Schaefer et al . 2017 ; Chassier et al . 2018 ), cattle ( Hozé et al .2013 ; Pausch etal .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The closed populations exhibited less genetic diversity, which favoured imputation. In horses, Chassier et al () obtained higher accuracies for Arab and Trotteur Français breeds that have closed studbooks and consequently less genetic diversity when compared to the Selle Français breed group with a studbook open to cross‐breeding. These findings also support our results and assumptions regarding imputation accuracies in a closed herd.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of imputation has been already checked in Chassier et al. (2018). On a slightly lower sample of the present data, the mean concordance rate per individual was 0.9903 and the mean r 2 was .9905.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%