2013
DOI: 10.5897/jpbcs2013.0387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability estimate of some sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam] breeding lines in South Africa

Abstract: Key words: Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, breeding lines, genotype by environment interaction, stability; sweet potato.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, GE becomes G when environments are subdivided into mega-environments. Sweetpotato root yields are highly affected by environment, also indicated by previous G × E studies (Adebola et al, 2013;Grüneberg et al, 2004Grüneberg et al, , 2005Gurmu et al, 2017;Tumwegamire et al, 2016). In agreement with a study from Papua New Guinea (Wera et al, 2018), the calculated megaenvironments were formed relating to the distinctiveness of major AEZ in which the trials were conducted.…”
Section: Crop Sciencesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, GE becomes G when environments are subdivided into mega-environments. Sweetpotato root yields are highly affected by environment, also indicated by previous G × E studies (Adebola et al, 2013;Grüneberg et al, 2004Grüneberg et al, , 2005Gurmu et al, 2017;Tumwegamire et al, 2016). In agreement with a study from Papua New Guinea (Wera et al, 2018), the calculated megaenvironments were formed relating to the distinctiveness of major AEZ in which the trials were conducted.…”
Section: Crop Sciencesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In cases where variance component estimations due to G × E (σ 2 G×E ) in METs are larger than variance component estimations due to genotypes (σ 2 G ), an analysis of G × E interactions should be undertaken (Fox, Crossa, & Romagosa, 1997). For sweetpotato storage root yield, the main commercial trait in this crop, large G × E interaction have been reported across environments in Kenya and Uganda (Grüneberg, Abidin, Ndolo, Pereira, & Hermann, 2004;Tumwegamire et al, 2016), over diverse environments in Peru (Grüneberg, Manrique, Zhang, & Hermann, 2005), in South Africa (Adebola, Shegro, Laurie, Zulu, & Pillay, 2013), and in Ethiopia (Gurmu, Hussein, & Laing, 2017). These studies highlight the importance of breeding regionally adapted material and testing new genotypes under conditions similar to the targeted population of environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires continuous selection of genetically fixed, stable and high yielding clones across representative sites in Rwanda. Moreover, fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation were not applied in this study, whereas they were in the other trials such as reported by Adebola et al (2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Previous reports pointed out highly significant ( P < 0.001) effects of environment, genotype and genotype by environmental interactions on qualitative and quantitative traits of sweetpotatoes (Mwololo et al, 2009; Adebola et al, 2013; Kathabwalika et al, 2013). In the present study significant interactions between family and site were observed affecting yields of storage roots and vines, total biomass and DMC of storage roots of sweetpotato.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation