2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-012-0081-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic Differences and Prior Defoliation Affect Re-Growth and Phytochemistry after Coppicing in Populus tremuloides

Abstract: Although considerable research has explored how tree growth and defense can be influenced by genotype, the biotic environment, and their interaction, little is known about how genotypic differences, prior defoliation, and their interactive effects persist in trees that re-grow after damage that severs their primary stem. To address these issues, we established a common garden consisting of twelve genotypes of potted aspen (Populus tremuloides) trees, and subjected half of the trees to defoliation in two succes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aspen frequently show pronounced phenotypic and chemical differences among genets (Stevens et al 2012;Kanaga et al 2008;Osier and Lindroth 2004). Collectively, the triploid stems in the current study belonged to four genotypes (clones), whereas the diploids stems belonged to 13 genotypes.…”
Section: Inherent Genotypic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Aspen frequently show pronounced phenotypic and chemical differences among genets (Stevens et al 2012;Kanaga et al 2008;Osier and Lindroth 2004). Collectively, the triploid stems in the current study belonged to four genotypes (clones), whereas the diploids stems belonged to 13 genotypes.…”
Section: Inherent Genotypic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The patterns of carbon-based phytochemical production among these genotypes were consistent with previous observations . Salicinoids and condensed tannins are both formed via the shikimate-phenylpropanoid pathway (Tsai et al 2006), and the inverse correlation (R=−0.40, P<0.001) between concentrations of these compounds has been reported elsewhere for aspen (Couture and Lindroth 2012;Hemming and Lindroth 1995;Stevens et al 2012). Collectively, the patterns of expression of carbon and protein-based defenses among different aspen genotypes may represent a genetically-determined and/or physiological tradeoff between production of different classes of secondary metabolites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…All trees were coppiced and allowed to reflush before surveys in 2010 and 2011, but not in 2012. Coppicing “resets” tree age and chemistry responds accordingly ( Stevens et al 2012 ) effectively making our trees phenologically ∼1-year-old in 2010 and 2011 but 2-years-old in 2012. Lines represent mean chemistry levels of each transgenic or wild-type (WT) poplar tree ( n = 7–10 replicate trees) at each date.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%